Image MIME Reference
FLIF
Free Lossless Image Format
image/flif
VS
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI
A complete technical comparison of Free Lossless Image Format and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | FLIF | MODI |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
Free Lossless Image Format
image/flif
Extension
.flif
Container
FLIF Bitstream
Compression
Lossless (MANIAC Entropy Coding)
Algorithm
MANIAC (Meta-Adaptive Near-zero Integer Arithmetic Coding)
Color Depth
1-bit to 16-bit (Per Channel), Grayscale, RGB, RGBA, CMYK
Developed by
Jon Sneyers and Pieter Wuille (Cloudinary)
Released
2015
Magic Bytes
46 4C 49 46
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | FLIF | MODI |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
FLIF
FLIF Strengths
- Achieves some of the highest lossless compression ratios ever developed for raster images
- Incredible progressive decoding allows an image to be highly recognizable even after only 5% of the file has been downloaded
- Supports animations and complex alpha channels losslessly
Limitations
- Officially abandoned in favor of JPEG XL
- Zero native support in web browsers or standard operating system previewers
- Encoding speed can be significantly slower than standard PNG or WebP compression
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
When to choose which format
FLIF
Use FLIF when…
- Archival of Uncompressed Image Assets
- Bandwidth-Constrained Progressive Image Loading (Historical)
- Medical and Scientific Imaging Storage
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage