Image MIME Reference
FITS
Flexible Image Transport System
image/fits
VS
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
JPEG-2000
A complete technical comparison of Flexible Image Transport System and JPEG 2000 Core Image File — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
JPEG-2000 wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | FITS | JPEG-2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
Flexible Image Transport System
image/fits
Extension
.fits.fit.fts
Container
FITS
Compression
Uncompressed / Tile Compressed (Rice, GZIP)
Algorithm
UncompressedRiceGZIPHcompress
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 64-bit (Float/Double)
Developed by
IAU FITS Working Group / NASA
Released
1981
Magic Bytes
53 49 4D 50 4C 45 20 20 3D 20
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
Extension
.jp2.j2k.jpf.jpx.jpm
Container
JP2 (ISO/IEC 15444-1)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group
Released
2000
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | FITS | JPEG-2000 |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ |
✓ 5+
|
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
FITS
FITS Strengths
- The undisputed global standard for archiving and sharing astronomical data
- Self-documenting: Headers are written in plain ASCII, ensuring data is readable decades later regardless of software
- Supports incredibly high dynamic range, N-dimensional arrays, and complex binary tables
Limitations
- No support in standard consumer software or web browsers
- Uncompressed raw FITS files from modern telescopes can be excessively large
- Does not use standard metadata models like EXIF or XMP, requiring specialized parsers
JPEG-2000
JPEG-2000 Strengths
- Superior compression efficiency over baseline JPEG without introducing blocking artifacts
- True mathematically lossless compression available in the same format
- Extremely scalable: a single file can be decoded at various resolutions (thumbnails to full size) without loading the entire file
Limitations
- Very poor native web browser support prevents it from being a web standard
- High computational complexity makes encoding and decoding significantly slower than JPEG
- Early patent concerns and complex licensing hindered its initial adoption rate
When to choose which format
FITS
Use FITS when…
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Space Telescope Data (Hubble, JWST)
- Scientific Data Archiving
- Spectroscopy
JPEG-2000
Use JPEG-2000 when…
- Digital Cinema (DCP)
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Archival Preservation