Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
FITS

Flexible Image Transport System

image/fits
VS

JPEG Image

image/jpeg
JPEG

A complete technical comparison of Flexible Image Transport System and JPEG Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

JPEG wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature FITS JPEG
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
Flexible Image Transport System
image/fits
Extension
.fits.fit.fts
Container FITS
Compression Uncompressed / Tile Compressed (Rice, GZIP)
Algorithm
UncompressedRiceGZIPHcompress
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 64-bit (Float/Double)
Developed by IAU FITS Working Group / NASA
Released 1981
Magic Bytes
53 49 4D 50 4C 45 20 20 3D 20
Full FITS reference →
JPEG Image
image/jpeg
Extension
.jpg.jpeg.jpe.jfif
Container JFIF / Exif
Compression Lossy
Algorithm
DCT (Discrete Cosine Transform)
Color Depth 8-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group
Released 1992
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF
Full JPEG reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser FITS JPEG
Chrome Chrome
✕
✓ All
Firefox Firefox
✕
✓ All
Safari Safari
✕
✓ All
Edge Edge
✕
✓ All
IE IE (Legacy)
✕
✓
FITS

FITS Strengths

  • The undisputed global standard for archiving and sharing astronomical data
  • Self-documenting: Headers are written in plain ASCII, ensuring data is readable decades later regardless of software
  • Supports incredibly high dynamic range, N-dimensional arrays, and complex binary tables
Limitations
  • No support in standard consumer software or web browsers
  • Uncompressed raw FITS files from modern telescopes can be excessively large
  • Does not use standard metadata models like EXIF or XMP, requiring specialized parsers
JPEG

JPEG Strengths

  • Universal support — every browser, OS, and application handles JPEG
  • Excellent compression for complex photographs with natural color gradients
  • Rich metadata support: EXIF (GPS, camera settings), ICC color profiles
Limitations
  • No transparency — cannot have a transparent background
  • Lossy compression introduces visible artifacts on sharp edges and text
  • No animation support

When to choose which format

FITS
Use FITS when…
  • Astronomy & Astrophysics
  • Space Telescope Data (Hubble, JWST)
  • Scientific Data Archiving
  • Spectroscopy
JPEG
Use JPEG when…
  • Photography
  • Websites
  • Social Media
  • Print

More comparisons

FITS vs ACES → JPEG vs ACES → FITS vs APNG → JPEG vs APNG → FITS vs AVCI → JPEG vs AVCI → FITS vs AVCS → JPEG vs AVCS → FITS vs AVIF → JPEG vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison