Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
FastBid

FastBid Sheet

image/vnd.fastbidsheet
VS

PWG Raster Format

image/pwg-raster
PWG-Raster

A complete technical comparison of FastBid Sheet and PWG Raster Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature FastBid PWG-Raster
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
FastBid Sheet
image/vnd.fastbidsheet
Extension
.fbs
Container Proprietary FastBid Container
Compression Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown
Color Depth Unknown
Developed by FastBid, Inc. (Scott Becker)
Released Late 1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
Full FastBid reference →
PWG Raster Format
image/pwg-raster
Extension
.pwg.ras
Container CUPS Raster v2 Container
Compression PackBits (Run-Length Encoding)
Algorithm
PackBits (Apple RLE variant)
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome/K), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (sRGB / Adobe RGB), 32-bit (CMYK)
Developed by IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group (PWG)
Released 2011
Magic Bytes
52 61 53 32
Full PWG-Raster reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser FastBid PWG-Raster
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
FastBid

FastBid Strengths

  • Historically allowed the FastBid application to securely associate and load proprietary construction plans within its ecosystem
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern software environments
  • The official IANA registration of the .fbs extension causes widespread false positives, breaking modern parsers, text editors, and AI SDKs attempting to read FlatBuffers schemas
PWG-Raster

PWG-Raster Strengths

  • The undisputed global standard for modern, driverless printing environments, eliminating the nightmare of installing manufacturer-specific print drivers
  • Extremely lightweight to decode on embedded hardware, requiring minimal RAM buffers on the printer side
  • Strict color space and resolution rules guarantee that the printed output will successfully process without syntax errors
Limitations
  • Generates massive file sizes and network payloads compared to vector-based formats like PDF or PostScript, as every page is fully rasterized at 300+ DPI before transmission
  • No support for native rendering in web browsers, image viewers, or graphic design software without specialized CUPS developer tools
  • Cannot store complex metadata, vector text, or layers

When to choose which format

FastBid
Use FastBid when…
  • Legacy Construction Blueprints
  • FastBid Estimating Software
  • Causing .fbs MIME Type Conflicts (FlatBuffers)
PWG-Raster
Use PWG-Raster when…
  • Driverless Network Printing (IPP Everywhere)
  • Apple AirPrint and Mopria Print Service Pipelines
  • CUPS (Common UNIX Printing System) Spooling
Share this comparison