Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
FastBid

FastBid Sheet

image/vnd.fastbidsheet
VS

JPEG XL

image/jxl
JXL

A complete technical comparison of FastBid Sheet and JPEG XL — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

JXL wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature FastBid JXL
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No Yes
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
FastBid Sheet
image/vnd.fastbidsheet
Extension
.fbs
Container Proprietary FastBid Container
Compression Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown
Color Depth Unknown
Developed by FastBid, Inc. (Scott Becker)
Released Late 1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
Full FastBid reference →
JPEG XL
image/jxl
Extension
.jxl
Container ISOBMFF / JPEG XL Codestream
Compression Lossy (VarDCT) / Lossless (Modular)
Algorithm
VarDCT (Variable block-size DCT)Modular (Predictive coding for lossless)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit (Float)
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2021
Magic Bytes
FF 0A (Codestream) / 00 00 00 0C 4A 58 4C 20 0D 0A 87 0A (Container)
Full JXL reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser FastBid JXL
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
✓ 17+
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
FastBid

FastBid Strengths

  • Historically allowed the FastBid application to securely associate and load proprietary construction plans within its ecosystem
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern software environments
  • The official IANA registration of the .fbs extension causes widespread false positives, breaking modern parsers, text editors, and AI SDKs attempting to read FlatBuffers schemas
JXL

JXL Strengths

  • Capable of losslessly recompressing legacy JPEG files, saving ~20% space while retaining perfect byte-for-byte restorability
  • Highly superior progressive decoding (Saliency-driven), allowing recognizable images to load extremely fast on slow connections
  • Outperforms WebP and competes favorably with AVIF, especially at high-fidelity settings and for complex textures/photography
  • Royalty-free with an open-source reference implementation (libjxl)
Limitations
  • Google's removal of JXL support from Chrome severely hindered its adoption as a universal web standard
  • Lack of hardware decoding chips compared to video-derived codecs like AVIF (AV1)
  • File parsing logic is complex due to the split between raw codestreams and ISOBMFF containers

When to choose which format

FastBid
Use FastBid when…
  • Legacy Construction Blueprints
  • FastBid Estimating Software
  • Causing .fbs MIME Type Conflicts (FlatBuffers)
JXL
Use JXL when…
  • High-End Web Delivery (via Safari/Polyfills)
  • HDR Photography
  • Legacy JPEG Archiving
  • Digital Art & Image Storage
Share this comparison