Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
Epson-ERF

Epson Raw Format

image/x-epson-erf
VS

T.38 Fax over IP (FoIP)

image/t38
T.38

A complete technical comparison of Epson Raw Format and T.38 Fax over IP (FoIP) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Epson-ERF T.38
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Epson Raw Format
image/x-epson-erf
Extension
.erf
Container TIFF/EP
Compression Uncompressed / Lossless JPEG (ITU-T81)
Algorithm
NoneLossless JPEG
Color Depth 12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Seiko Epson Corporation
Released 2004
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 or 4D 4D 00 2A
Full Epson-ERF reference →
T.38 Fax over IP (FoIP)
image/t38
Extension
.t38
Container UDPTL or TCP (Network Transport)
Compression Lossless (MH, MR, MMR / T.4, T.6)
Algorithm
MH (Modified Huffman)MR (Modified Read)MMR (Modified Modified Read)
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome B&W)
Developed by ITU-T (International Telecommunication Union)
Released 1998
Magic Bytes
None (Network Stream)
Full T.38 reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Epson-ERF T.38
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
Epson-ERF

Epson-ERF Strengths

  • Preserves original raw sensor data, allowing extreme recovery of highlights and shadows compared to in-camera JPEGs
  • Utilizes the standard TIFF container structure, making it relatively easy for open-source software (like dcraw and LibRaw) to parse and decode
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete proprietary format tied to a defunct line of digital cameras
  • Requires parsing EXIF metadata to differentiate it from standard TIFF files programmatically
  • Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized codecs
T.38

T.38 Strengths

  • Designed specifically to overcome the timing and packet-loss issues that plague traditional fax over standard VoIP audio codecs (like G.711)
  • Reduces bandwidth requirements by transmitting fax protocol data rather than uncompressed audio tones
  • Universally supported by enterprise SIP trunks and Session Border Controllers (SBCs) for FoIP
Limitations
  • Not an actual image file format, causing confusion due to its 'image/' MIME classification
  • Extremely complex to implement correctly over lossy UDP networks (relies on UDPTL redundancy mechanisms)
  • Zero support in web browsers or standard image viewing software

When to choose which format

Epson-ERF
Use Epson-ERF when…
  • Vintage Digital Photography (Epson R-D1)
  • Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
  • Raw Imaging Archival
T.38
Use T.38 when…
  • Fax over IP (FoIP) Transmissions
  • SIP/SDP Media Negotiation
  • VoIP Gateways and PBX Systems
  • Enterprise Fax Servers

More comparisons

Epson-ERF vs ACES → T.38 vs ACES → Epson-ERF vs APNG → T.38 vs APNG → Epson-ERF vs AVCI → T.38 vs AVCI → Epson-ERF vs AVCS → T.38 vs AVCS → Epson-ERF vs AVIF → T.38 vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison