Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
EMF

Windows Enhanced Metafile

image/x-emf
VS

Free Lossless Image Format

image/flif
FLIF

A complete technical comparison of Windows Enhanced Metafile and Free Lossless Image Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature EMF FLIF
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No Yes
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
Windows Enhanced Metafile
image/x-emf
Extension
.emf
Container Windows GDI/GDI+ Record Sequence
Compression Uncompressed (Binary Drawing Records)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth Vector (32-bit GDI/GDI+ Colors), Supports embedded 24-bit/32-bit bitmaps
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 1993
Magic Bytes
01 00 00 00 (Header Type) ... 20 45 4D 46 (Signature at offset 40)
Full EMF reference →
Free Lossless Image Format
image/flif
Extension
.flif
Container FLIF Bitstream
Compression Lossless (MANIAC Entropy Coding)
Algorithm
MANIAC (Meta-Adaptive Near-zero Integer Arithmetic Coding)
Color Depth 1-bit to 16-bit (Per Channel), Grayscale, RGB, RGBA, CMYK
Developed by Jon Sneyers and Pieter Wuille (Cloudinary)
Released 2015
Magic Bytes
46 4C 49 46
Full FLIF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser EMF FLIF
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✓
 ✕
EMF

EMF Strengths

  • Device independent, meaning it renders consistently across different monitors and printers regardless of resolution
  • Fully supports 32-bit precision and advanced GDI+ drawing commands, including alpha transparency and anti-aliasing (EMF+)
  • Native rendering within the Windows OS ensures fast performance and flawless fidelity in Microsoft Office applications
Limitations
  • Heavily tied to the Windows Graphics Device Interface API, making it notoriously difficult to parse perfectly on macOS or Linux
  • Completely unsupported by modern web standards; cannot be embedded in HTML without conversion to SVG
  • Security history: Like WMF, malicious drawing records can theoretically exploit vulnerabilities in older GDI parsers
FLIF

FLIF Strengths

  • Achieves some of the highest lossless compression ratios ever developed for raster images
  • Incredible progressive decoding allows an image to be highly recognizable even after only 5% of the file has been downloaded
  • Supports animations and complex alpha channels losslessly
Limitations
  • Officially abandoned in favor of JPEG XL
  • Zero native support in web browsers or standard operating system previewers
  • Encoding speed can be significantly slower than standard PNG or WebP compression

When to choose which format

EMF
Use EMF when…
  • Microsoft Office Vector Graphics and Clip Art
  • Windows Print Spooling (EMF Spool Files)
  • High-fidelity Vector Interchange on Windows
FLIF
Use FLIF when…
  • Archival of Uncompressed Image Assets
  • Bandwidth-Constrained Progressive Image Loading (Historical)
  • Medical and Scientific Imaging Storage

More comparisons

EMF vs ACES → FLIF vs ACES → EMF vs APNG → FLIF vs APNG → EMF vs AVCI → FLIF vs AVCI → EMF vs AVCS → FLIF vs AVCS → EMF vs AVIF → FLIF vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison