Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
EDMICS-RLC

Fuji Xerox EDMICS-RLC

image/vnd.fujixerox.edmics-rlc
VS

Tencent TAP Image

image/vnd.tencent.tap
Tencent-TAP

A complete technical comparison of Fuji Xerox EDMICS-RLC and Tencent TAP Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature EDMICS-RLC Tencent-TAP
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Fuji Xerox EDMICS-RLC
image/vnd.fujixerox.edmics-rlc
Extension
.rlc.edm
Container Fuji Xerox EDMICS Wrapper
Compression Run-Length Coding (RLC / RLE)
Algorithm
Run-Length Coding (RLC)
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale)
Developed by Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.
Released 1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary Container)
Full EDMICS-RLC reference →
Tencent TAP Image
image/vnd.tencent.tap
Extension
.tap
Container Proprietary Tencent Container
Compression Unknown (Proprietary)
Algorithm
Unknown
Color Depth Unknown
Developed by Tencent (Registered by Ni Hui)
Released 2014
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
Full Tencent-TAP reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser EDMICS-RLC Tencent-TAP
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
EDMICS-RLC

EDMICS-RLC Strengths

  • Simple, computationally inexpensive Run-Length Coding enabled rapid compression and decompression on low-power legacy hardware
  • Deeply integrated into Fuji Xerox enterprise hardware for seamless, automated scan-to-archive workflows
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and closed-source, making modern archival extraction and migration extremely difficult
  • No support in modern image processing libraries like ImageMagick, libvips, or standard viewers without bespoke decoding tools
  • RLC compression is far less efficient than modern algorithms like PNG (Deflate) for complex documents
Tencent-TAP

Tencent-TAP Strengths

  • Officially registered with IANA, ensuring a unique MIME type identifier for internal Tencent network routing and content negotiation
Limitations
  • Completely undocumented and closed-source, making it impossible to decode or parse outside of Tencent's software
  • Shares its file extension (.tap) with numerous other established legacy formats, leading to frequent automated file misidentification by Node/Python libraries

When to choose which format

EDMICS-RLC
Use EDMICS-RLC when…
  • Fuji Xerox EDMICS Enterprise Systems
  • Archival of Scanned Engineering Documents
  • Legacy Corporate Scanning Pipelines
Tencent-TAP
Use Tencent-TAP when…
  • Internal Tencent Ecosystem Applications
  • Proprietary Mobile or Gaming Assets
Share this comparison