Image MIME Reference
EDMICS-RLC
Fuji Xerox EDMICS-RLC
image/vnd.fujixerox.edmics-rlc
VS
Scalable Vector Graphics
image/svg+xml
SVG
A complete technical comparison of Fuji Xerox EDMICS-RLC and Scalable Vector Graphics — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
SVG wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | EDMICS-RLC | SVG |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Fuji Xerox EDMICS-RLC
image/vnd.fujixerox.edmics-rlc
Extension
.rlc.edm
Container
Fuji Xerox EDMICS Wrapper
Compression
Run-Length Coding (RLC / RLE)
Algorithm
Run-Length Coding (RLC)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale)
Developed by
Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.
Released
1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary Container)
Scalable Vector Graphics
image/svg+xml
Extension
.svg.svgz
Container
XML Document
Compression
Uncompressed (Plain Text XML) / Lossless (GZIP via .svgz)
Algorithm
None (for .svg)GZIP (for .svgz)
Color Depth
Vector (Independent of bit-depth), CSS Colors (HEX, RGB, HSL, Display-P3)
Developed by
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
3C 73 76 67 (for <svg) / 3C 3F 78 6D 6C (for <?xml)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | EDMICS-RLC | SVG |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
Firefox
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
Safari
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
Edge
|
✕ |
✓ All
|
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
EDMICS-RLC
EDMICS-RLC Strengths
- Simple, computationally inexpensive Run-Length Coding enabled rapid compression and decompression on low-power legacy hardware
- Deeply integrated into Fuji Xerox enterprise hardware for seamless, automated scan-to-archive workflows
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and closed-source, making modern archival extraction and migration extremely difficult
- No support in modern image processing libraries like ImageMagick, libvips, or standard viewers without bespoke decoding tools
- RLC compression is far less efficient than modern algorithms like PNG (Deflate) for complex documents
SVG
SVG Strengths
- Provides infinite resolution scalability, looking perfectly crisp on high-DPI (Retina) displays without increasing file size
- Extremely lightweight compared to raster formats for flat graphics, logos, and UI elements
- Can be manipulated dynamically via the browser's CSS and JavaScript engines (DOM integration)
Limitations
- Unsuitable for complex photographic images or photorealistic textures
- Poses critical security vulnerabilities (XSS and XML External Entity attacks) if user-uploaded SVGs are not heavily sanitized
- Rendering performance degrades significantly if the SVG contains tens of thousands of complex nodes or deeply nested paths
When to choose which format
EDMICS-RLC
Use EDMICS-RLC when…
- Fuji Xerox EDMICS Enterprise Systems
- Archival of Scanned Engineering Documents
- Legacy Corporate Scanning Pipelines
SVG
Use SVG when…
- Web Logos & UI Icons
- Responsive Web Design Elements
- Interactive Data Visualizations (D3.js)
- CSS and SMIL Web Animations