Image MIME Reference
EDMICS-RLC
Fuji Xerox EDMICS-RLC
image/vnd.fujixerox.edmics-rlc
VS
JPEG Network Graphics
image/x-jng
JNG
A complete technical comparison of Fuji Xerox EDMICS-RLC and JPEG Network Graphics — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | EDMICS-RLC | JNG |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
Fuji Xerox EDMICS-RLC
image/vnd.fujixerox.edmics-rlc
Extension
.rlc.edm
Container
Fuji Xerox EDMICS Wrapper
Compression
Run-Length Coding (RLC / RLE)
Algorithm
Run-Length Coding (RLC)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale)
Developed by
Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.
Released
1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary Container)
JPEG Network Graphics
image/x-jng
Extension
.jng
Container
PNG-style Chunk Structure (JHDR, JDAT, IDAT, IEND)
Compression
Lossy (JPEG/DCT for color) / Lossless (Deflate for alpha mask)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)Deflate (LZ77)
Color Depth
8-bit, 12-bit, 24-bit (RGB), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by
MNG Development Group (Glenn Randers-Pehrson et al.)
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
8B 4A 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | EDMICS-RLC | JNG |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
EDMICS-RLC
EDMICS-RLC Strengths
- Simple, computationally inexpensive Run-Length Coding enabled rapid compression and decompression on low-power legacy hardware
- Deeply integrated into Fuji Xerox enterprise hardware for seamless, automated scan-to-archive workflows
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and closed-source, making modern archival extraction and migration extremely difficult
- No support in modern image processing libraries like ImageMagick, libvips, or standard viewers without bespoke decoding tools
- RLC compression is far less efficient than modern algorithms like PNG (Deflate) for complex documents
JNG
JNG Strengths
- Solved a massive technical hurdle in the early 2000s by combining high-compression lossy photographic data with crisp, 8-bit alpha transparency
- Utilized the highly robust, extensible chunk-based architecture of the PNG format
- Provided an excellent, bandwidth-saving alternative to massive 32-bit transparent PNGs for web design
Limitations
- Failed to achieve critical mass; browser vendors largely abandoned the MNG/JNG standard due to implementation complexity
- Completely obsolete today, having been superseded by natively supported, superior formats like WebP, AVIF, and HEIC
- Decoding requires a hybrid engine that can parse PNG chunks while simultaneously decoding a JPEG stream and a Deflate stream, complicating software support
When to choose which format
EDMICS-RLC
Use EDMICS-RLC when…
- Fuji Xerox EDMICS Enterprise Systems
- Archival of Scanned Engineering Documents
- Legacy Corporate Scanning Pipelines
JNG
Use JNG when…
- Embedded frames in MNG animations
- Historical web graphics requiring lossy compression with transparency