Image MIME Reference
EDMICS-MMR
Fuji Xerox EDMICS-MMR
image/vnd.fujixerox.edmics-mmr
VS
SealedMedia SoftSeal JPEG
image/vnd.sealedmedia.softseal.jpg
SoftSeal-JPEG
A complete technical comparison of Fuji Xerox EDMICS-MMR and SealedMedia SoftSeal JPEG — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | EDMICS-MMR | SoftSeal-JPEG |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Fuji Xerox EDMICS-MMR
image/vnd.fujixerox.edmics-mmr
Extension
.mmr.edm
Container
Fuji Xerox EDMICS Wrapper
Compression
Modified Modified READ (MMR / Group 4 Fax)
Algorithm
MMR (ITU-T T.6 / CCITT Group 4)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome / Bi-level)
Developed by
Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.
Released
1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary Container wrapped around MMR bitstream)
SealedMedia SoftSeal JPEG
image/vnd.sealedmedia.softseal.jpg
Extension
.sjpg.sealed-jpg.sealed-jpeg
Container
SealedMedia SoftSeal Wrapper
Compression
Encrypted Payload (DCT)
Algorithm
AES EncryptionDiscrete Cosine Transform (Internal JPEG payload)
Color Depth
Encrypted Payload (Historically 24-bit RGB)
Developed by
SealedMedia (Acquired by Oracle Corporation)
Released
Late 1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary SealedMedia Container)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | EDMICS-MMR | SoftSeal-JPEG |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
EDMICS-MMR
EDMICS-MMR Strengths
- Utilized the highly efficient MMR (Group 4) algorithm, which allowed massive, E-size engineering blueprints to be compressed into tiny file sizes suitable for 1990s hard drives and networks
- Deeply integrated into Fuji Xerox hardware and database systems for seamless scan-to-archive workflows
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and closed-source, making modern archival extraction and migration extremely difficult
- No support in modern image processing libraries like ImageMagick, libvips, or standard TIFF viewers without first stripping the proprietary header
- Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome images
SoftSeal-JPEG
SoftSeal-JPEG Strengths
- Offered persistent document security; if a sensitive photo was emailed outside the company, it remained encrypted and unviewable without server authentication
- Administrators possessed the ability to remotely revoke viewing rights to a specific image globally at any time
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and relies on a central authentication server; if the server goes offline or the product is deprecated, the image is permanently inaccessible
- Zero support in modern operating systems, web browsers, or standard image editing suites without heavy enterprise client installations
- Oracle effectively discontinued the IRM product line, stranding many legacy sealed documents
When to choose which format
EDMICS-MMR
Use EDMICS-MMR when…
- Fuji Xerox EDMICS Enterprise Systems
- Archival of Large-Format Engineering Drawings
- Legacy Corporate Document Scanning Pipelines
SoftSeal-JPEG
Use SoftSeal-JPEG when…
- Enterprise Information Rights Management (IRM)
- Secure Distribution of Sensitive Photography
- Revocable Corporate Document Access