Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
EDMICS-MMR

Fuji Xerox EDMICS-MMR

image/vnd.fujixerox.edmics-mmr
VS

High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream

image/jphc
HTJ2K-Codestream

A complete technical comparison of Fuji Xerox EDMICS-MMR and High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature EDMICS-MMR HTJ2K-Codestream
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Fuji Xerox EDMICS-MMR
image/vnd.fujixerox.edmics-mmr
Extension
.mmr.edm
Container Fuji Xerox EDMICS Wrapper
Compression Modified Modified READ (MMR / Group 4 Fax)
Algorithm
MMR (ITU-T T.6 / CCITT Group 4)
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome / Bi-level)
Developed by Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.
Released 1990s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary Container wrapped around MMR bitstream)
Full EDMICS-MMR reference →
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/jphc
Extension
.jhc
Container None (Raw Codestream)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
FF 4F FF 51
Full HTJ2K-Codestream reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser EDMICS-MMR HTJ2K-Codestream
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
EDMICS-MMR

EDMICS-MMR Strengths

  • Utilized the highly efficient MMR (Group 4) algorithm, which allowed massive, E-size engineering blueprints to be compressed into tiny file sizes suitable for 1990s hard drives and networks
  • Deeply integrated into Fuji Xerox hardware and database systems for seamless scan-to-archive workflows
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and closed-source, making modern archival extraction and migration extremely difficult
  • No support in modern image processing libraries like ImageMagick, libvips, or standard TIFF viewers without first stripping the proprietary header
  • Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome images
HTJ2K-Codestream

HTJ2K-Codestream Strengths

  • Extremely fast encoding and decoding capabilities due to the parallelizable block coder
  • Minimal file overhead since it lacks container headers and metadata
  • Ideal for streaming applications or embedded systems where parsing a full container is unnecessary
Limitations
  • Lacks standard metadata support (like EXIF, XMP, or ICC color profiles) since there is no container structure
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Difficult to distinguish from standard JPEG 2000 codestreams without deeply parsing the internal marker segments

When to choose which format

EDMICS-MMR
Use EDMICS-MMR when…
  • Fuji Xerox EDMICS Enterprise Systems
  • Archival of Large-Format Engineering Drawings
  • Legacy Corporate Document Scanning Pipelines
HTJ2K-Codestream
Use HTJ2K-Codestream when…
  • Medical Imaging Pipelines
  • Geospatial Data Streaming
  • Digital Cinema
  • Embedded Systems
Share this comparison