Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
DXF

Drawing Exchange Format

image/vnd.dxf
VS

FlashPix

image/vnd.fpx
FPX

A complete technical comparison of Drawing Exchange Format and FlashPix — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature DXF FPX
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
Drawing Exchange Format
image/vnd.dxf
Extension
.dxf
Container Text / Binary Container
Compression Uncompressed (ASCII) / Uncompressed (Binary)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth Vector (Indexed AutoCAD Colors / True Color)
Developed by Autodesk
Released 1982
Magic Bytes
30 0D 0A 53 45 43 54 49 4F 4E (ASCII) / 41 75 74 6F 43 41 44 20 42 69 6E 61 72 79 20 44 58 46 0D 0A 1A 00 (Binary)
Full DXF reference →
FlashPix
image/vnd.fpx
Extension
.fpx
Container Microsoft OLE Structured Storage (COM)
Compression JPEG (Lossy) / Uncompressed / Single-color (Solid)
Algorithm
JPEGNone
Color Depth 8-bit (Grayscale/Indexed), 24-bit (RGB), 32-bit (CMYK/RGBA)
Developed by Eastman Kodak, Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, Live Picture
Released 1996
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1
Full FPX reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser DXF FPX
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
DXF

DXF Strengths

  • Universally supported by almost every CAD program, 3D modeler, and vector graphics editor in existence
  • ASCII structure is human-readable and can be parsed or generated programmatically with relative ease
  • The de facto standard for sending 2D cutting paths to CNC routers, plasma cutters, and laser engravers
Limitations
  • ASCII DXF files can be enormously large and inefficient compared to binary DWG files
  • The format relies heavily on legacy AutoCAD data structures, making complex 3D entity parsing extremely difficult for third-party developers
  • Lacks native web browser rendering capabilities
FPX

FPX Strengths

  • Allowed early, low-RAM computers to view and edit massive, high-resolution digital photos instantly by only loading the needed tiles and resolutions
  • Pioneered the multi-resolution pyramid and tiling concepts heavily used today in modern deep-zoom and web mapping applications (like Google Maps)
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported by modern web browsers or operating systems
  • Uses the complex, proprietary Microsoft OLE container format, making it incredibly difficult to parse or extract data from without dedicated legacy libraries
  • Prone to being misidentified by MIME sniffers as an old Microsoft Office document

When to choose which format

DXF
Use DXF when…
  • Cross-Platform CAD Data Exchange
  • CNC Machining and Laser Cutting Paths
  • PCB Design Outlines
  • Architectural 2D Layouts
FPX
Use FPX when…
  • Legacy Digital Photography
  • Kodak Picture CDs (Historical)
  • Early High-Resolution Image Viewers

More comparisons

DXF vs ACES → FPX vs ACES → DXF vs APNG → FPX vs APNG → DXF vs AVCI → FPX vs AVCI → DXF vs AVCS → FPX vs AVCS → DXF vs AVIF → FPX vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison