Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
DWG

AutoCAD Drawing

image/vnd.dwg
VS

PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree)

image/prs.pti
PTI

A complete technical comparison of AutoCAD Drawing and PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature DWG PTI
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
AutoCAD Drawing
image/vnd.dwg
Extension
.dwg
Container DWG Binary Container
Compression Proprietary Binary Compression (LZ77 based in newer versions)
Algorithm
Proprietary (Autodesk ObjectDBX)
Color Depth Vector (True Color / Indexed AutoCAD Color Index)
Developed by Autodesk
Released 1982
Magic Bytes
41 43 31 30 (AC10)
Full DWG reference →
PTI Image (Personal/Vanity Tree)
image/prs.pti
Extension
.pti
Container Proprietary
Compression Unknown / Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown
Color Depth Unknown
Developed by Jürn Laun
Released 1999
Magic Bytes
Unknown
Full PTI reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser DWG PTI
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
DWG

DWG Strengths

  • The undisputed industry standard for 2D drafting and basic 3D CAD modeling
  • Highly optimized binary structure keeps file sizes relatively small compared to text-based CAD formats like DXF
  • Supports incredibly complex datasets including external references (XREFs), dynamic blocks, and extensive custom metadata
Limitations
  • It is a closed, proprietary format, making it difficult for third-party developers to support fully without licensing the Open Design Alliance (ODA) SDK
  • Lacks native web or standard operating system previewer support
  • Format versions change frequently (roughly every 3 years), breaking backward compatibility for older CAD software
PTI

PTI Strengths

  • Provided a registered MIME type namespace for a specific application's proprietary image format without conflicting with standard web types
Limitations
  • Completely undocumented and unsupported in modern ecosystems
  • Zero web browser compatibility
  • Falls into the 'vanity' tree, making it irrelevant for standard cross-platform data exchange

When to choose which format

DWG
Use DWG when…
  • Architectural Floor Plans
  • Mechanical Engineering Models
  • Civil Engineering Drafts
  • 3D Product Designs
PTI
Use PTI when…
  • Legacy Application Specific Workflows
  • Proprietary Image Storage
Share this comparison