Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
DVB-SUB

DVB Subtitle

image/vnd.dvb.subtitle
VS

RealNetworks RealPix

image/vnd.rn-realpix
RealPix

A complete technical comparison of DVB Subtitle and RealNetworks RealPix — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature DVB-SUB RealPix
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No Yes
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
DVB Subtitle
image/vnd.dvb.subtitle
Extension
.sub.sup.ts
Container MPEG-2 Transport Stream (MPEG-TS) PES Packets
Compression Lossless (Run-Length Encoding)
Algorithm
RLE (Run-Length Encoding)
Color Depth 2-bit (Indexed), 4-bit (Indexed), 8-bit (Indexed CLUT)
Developed by DVB Project (ETSI)
Released 1997
Magic Bytes
20
Full DVB-SUB reference →
RealNetworks RealPix
image/vnd.rn-realpix
Extension
.rp
Container IMFL (XML Markup)
Compression Uncompressed (Plain Text Markup)
Algorithm
None (Plain Text)
Color Depth Dependent on referenced images
Developed by RealNetworks
Released 1998
Magic Bytes
3C 69 6D 66 6C
Full RealPix reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser DVB-SUB RealPix
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
DVB-SUB

DVB-SUB Strengths

  • Guarantees 100% accurate visual representation (fonts, colors, layouts) exactly as intended by the broadcaster
  • Effortlessly supports complex character sets (e.g., Arabic, Asian languages) without relying on the client device possessing the necessary fonts
  • Supports region-specific dynamic positioning to avoid obscuring important on-screen graphics or burned-in lower thirds
Limitations
  • Requires significantly more bandwidth than text-based subtitles
  • Inaccessible to screen readers and cannot be indexed by search engines
  • Requires OCR (Optical Character Recognition) to translate back into standard text-based web formats
  • Zero native support in HTML5 video elements
RealPix

RealPix Strengths

  • Allowed for 'Ken Burns'-style animated slideshows at a fraction of the bandwidth required for actual video, crucial for 1990s dial-up connections
  • Plain text XML architecture made it easy for developers and hobbyists to hand-code complex multimedia presentations
  • Perfectly synchronized with RealAudio streams using SMIL-like timing parameters
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and heavily reliant on the proprietary, defunct RealPlayer browser plugin
  • Not a true image format, causing confusion when handled by standard image processing libraries which expect binary pixel data
  • Lacks modern CSS or HTML5 canvas equivalents without completely rewriting the presentation logic

When to choose which format

DVB-SUB
Use DVB-SUB when…
  • Digital Television Broadcasts (DVB-T, DVB-S, DVB-C)
  • IPTV and OTT Streaming
  • Hardware Set-top Boxes
RealPix
Use RealPix when…
  • Historical Dial-up Streaming Presentations
  • RealPlayer Slideshows
  • Bandwidth-efficient 'Video' Alternatives (late 1990s)
Share this comparison