Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
DVB-SUB

DVB Subtitle

image/vnd.dvb.subtitle
VS

High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream

image/jphc
HTJ2K-Codestream

A complete technical comparison of DVB Subtitle and High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature DVB-SUB HTJ2K-Codestream
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
DVB Subtitle
image/vnd.dvb.subtitle
Extension
.sub.sup.ts
Container MPEG-2 Transport Stream (MPEG-TS) PES Packets
Compression Lossless (Run-Length Encoding)
Algorithm
RLE (Run-Length Encoding)
Color Depth 2-bit (Indexed), 4-bit (Indexed), 8-bit (Indexed CLUT)
Developed by DVB Project (ETSI)
Released 1997
Magic Bytes
20
Full DVB-SUB reference →
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/jphc
Extension
.jhc
Container None (Raw Codestream)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
FF 4F FF 51
Full HTJ2K-Codestream reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser DVB-SUB HTJ2K-Codestream
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
DVB-SUB

DVB-SUB Strengths

  • Guarantees 100% accurate visual representation (fonts, colors, layouts) exactly as intended by the broadcaster
  • Effortlessly supports complex character sets (e.g., Arabic, Asian languages) without relying on the client device possessing the necessary fonts
  • Supports region-specific dynamic positioning to avoid obscuring important on-screen graphics or burned-in lower thirds
Limitations
  • Requires significantly more bandwidth than text-based subtitles
  • Inaccessible to screen readers and cannot be indexed by search engines
  • Requires OCR (Optical Character Recognition) to translate back into standard text-based web formats
  • Zero native support in HTML5 video elements
HTJ2K-Codestream

HTJ2K-Codestream Strengths

  • Extremely fast encoding and decoding capabilities due to the parallelizable block coder
  • Minimal file overhead since it lacks container headers and metadata
  • Ideal for streaming applications or embedded systems where parsing a full container is unnecessary
Limitations
  • Lacks standard metadata support (like EXIF, XMP, or ICC color profiles) since there is no container structure
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Difficult to distinguish from standard JPEG 2000 codestreams without deeply parsing the internal marker segments

When to choose which format

DVB-SUB
Use DVB-SUB when…
  • Digital Television Broadcasts (DVB-T, DVB-S, DVB-C)
  • IPTV and OTT Streaming
  • Hardware Set-top Boxes
HTJ2K-Codestream
Use HTJ2K-Codestream when…
  • Medical Imaging Pipelines
  • Geospatial Data Streaming
  • Digital Cinema
  • Embedded Systems
Share this comparison