Image MIME Reference
DjVu
DjVu Document
image/vnd.djvu
VS
X Pixmap
image/x-xpixmap
XPM
A complete technical comparison of DjVu Document and X Pixmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | DjVu | XPM |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
DjVu Document
image/vnd.djvu
Extension
.djvu.djv
Container
Interchange File Format (IFF)
Compression
JB2 (Bi-tonal Text) / IW44 (Wavelet Background) / BZZ (General Data/Text)
Algorithm
JB2IW44BZZ
Color Depth
1-bit (Foreground Text), 24-bit (Background)
Developed by
AT&T Labs (Yann LeCun, Léon Bottou, Patrick Haffner, Paul G. Howard)
Released
1996
Magic Bytes
41 54 26 54 46 4F 52 4D
X Pixmap
image/x-xpixmap
Extension
.xpm
Container
C Source Code Header (.c / .h)
Compression
Uncompressed (Source Code)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
Indexed Color (Custom Palette with RGB and Alpha 'None')
Developed by
Daniel Dardailler and Colas Nahaboo (Bull / X Consortium)
Released
1989
Magic Bytes
2F 2A 20 58 50 4D 20 2A 2F (ASCII '/* XPM */')
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | DjVu | XPM |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ |
✓
|
DjVu
DjVu Strengths
- Unmatched compression ratios for high-resolution scanned documents (often 5 to 10 times smaller than equivalent JPEG/TIFF-based PDFs)
- Separates text layers cleanly from backgrounds, allowing for highly legible text even at low file sizes
- Embedded OCR (Optical Character Recognition) text layers allow for fast searching
Limitations
- Lacks native support in modern operating systems and web browsers, requiring third-party software
- Largely superseded by PDF/A and modern PDF compression standards in standard corporate workflows
- Not suitable for vector graphics or born-digital documents (like Word exports), where standard PDF is far superior
XPM
XPM Strengths
- Can be compiled directly into C or C++ source code without requiring an external asset loading mechanism
- Human-readable palette mapping allows developers to inspect, modify, or hand-craft icons directly within a text editor
- Native support for color palettes and transparency via the 'None' keyword
Limitations
- Extremely inefficient storage structure for large images, resulting in massive file bloat compared to binary formats like PNG
- Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web browsers
- Parsing overhead requires compiling or interpreting text-based color tables at runtime
When to choose which format
DjVu
Use DjVu when…
- Scanned Books and Manuals
- Digital Libraries (e.g., Internet Archive)
- Historical Document Archiving
XPM
Use XPM when…
- X Window System (X11) Application Icons and Cursors
- Embedded C/C++ Firmware Color UI Assets
- Early Linux Desktop Environment Themes