Image MIME Reference
DjVu
DjVu Document
image/vnd.djvu
VS
T.38 Fax over IP (FoIP)
image/t38
T.38
A complete technical comparison of DjVu Document and T.38 Fax over IP (FoIP) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | DjVu | T.38 |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
DjVu Document
image/vnd.djvu
Extension
.djvu.djv
Container
Interchange File Format (IFF)
Compression
JB2 (Bi-tonal Text) / IW44 (Wavelet Background) / BZZ (General Data/Text)
Algorithm
JB2IW44BZZ
Color Depth
1-bit (Foreground Text), 24-bit (Background)
Developed by
AT&T Labs (Yann LeCun, Léon Bottou, Patrick Haffner, Paul G. Howard)
Released
1996
Magic Bytes
41 54 26 54 46 4F 52 4D
T.38 Fax over IP (FoIP)
image/t38
Extension
.t38
Container
UDPTL or TCP (Network Transport)
Compression
Lossless (MH, MR, MMR / T.4, T.6)
Algorithm
MH (Modified Huffman)MR (Modified Read)MMR (Modified Modified Read)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome B&W)
Developed by
ITU-T (International Telecommunication Union)
Released
1998
Magic Bytes
None (Network Stream)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | DjVu | T.38 |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
DjVu
DjVu Strengths
- Unmatched compression ratios for high-resolution scanned documents (often 5 to 10 times smaller than equivalent JPEG/TIFF-based PDFs)
- Separates text layers cleanly from backgrounds, allowing for highly legible text even at low file sizes
- Embedded OCR (Optical Character Recognition) text layers allow for fast searching
Limitations
- Lacks native support in modern operating systems and web browsers, requiring third-party software
- Largely superseded by PDF/A and modern PDF compression standards in standard corporate workflows
- Not suitable for vector graphics or born-digital documents (like Word exports), where standard PDF is far superior
T.38
T.38 Strengths
- Designed specifically to overcome the timing and packet-loss issues that plague traditional fax over standard VoIP audio codecs (like G.711)
- Reduces bandwidth requirements by transmitting fax protocol data rather than uncompressed audio tones
- Universally supported by enterprise SIP trunks and Session Border Controllers (SBCs) for FoIP
Limitations
- Not an actual image file format, causing confusion due to its 'image/' MIME classification
- Extremely complex to implement correctly over lossy UDP networks (relies on UDPTL redundancy mechanisms)
- Zero support in web browsers or standard image viewing software
When to choose which format
DjVu
Use DjVu when…
- Scanned Books and Manuals
- Digital Libraries (e.g., Internet Archive)
- Historical Document Archiving
T.38
Use T.38 when…
- Fax over IP (FoIP) Transmissions
- SIP/SDP Media Negotiation
- VoIP Gateways and PBX Systems
- Enterprise Fax Servers