Image MIME Reference
DjVu
DjVu Document
image/vnd.djvu
VS
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI
A complete technical comparison of DjVu Document and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | DjVu | MODI |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
DjVu Document
image/vnd.djvu
Extension
.djvu.djv
Container
Interchange File Format (IFF)
Compression
JB2 (Bi-tonal Text) / IW44 (Wavelet Background) / BZZ (General Data/Text)
Algorithm
JB2IW44BZZ
Color Depth
1-bit (Foreground Text), 24-bit (Background)
Developed by
AT&T Labs (Yann LeCun, Léon Bottou, Patrick Haffner, Paul G. Howard)
Released
1996
Magic Bytes
41 54 26 54 46 4F 52 4D
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | DjVu | MODI |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
DjVu
DjVu Strengths
- Unmatched compression ratios for high-resolution scanned documents (often 5 to 10 times smaller than equivalent JPEG/TIFF-based PDFs)
- Separates text layers cleanly from backgrounds, allowing for highly legible text even at low file sizes
- Embedded OCR (Optical Character Recognition) text layers allow for fast searching
Limitations
- Lacks native support in modern operating systems and web browsers, requiring third-party software
- Largely superseded by PDF/A and modern PDF compression standards in standard corporate workflows
- Not suitable for vector graphics or born-digital documents (like Word exports), where standard PDF is far superior
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
When to choose which format
DjVu
Use DjVu when…
- Scanned Books and Manuals
- Digital Libraries (e.g., Internet Archive)
- Historical Document Archiving
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage