Image MIME Reference
DICOM-RLE
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
VS
Sony SRF Raw Image
image/x-sony-srf
Sony-SRF
A complete technical comparison of DICOM Run-Length Encoding and Sony SRF Raw Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | DICOM-RLE | Sony-SRF |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
Extension
.dcm.dicom
Container
DICOM (PS3.10)
Compression
Lossless (RLE)
Algorithm
Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by
National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) / ACR
Released
1993
Magic Bytes
44 49 43 4D (at byte offset 128)
Sony SRF Raw Image
image/x-sony-srf
Extension
.srf
Container
TIFF-based (Proprietary)
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Sony Corporation
Released
2003
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | DICOM-RLE | Sony-SRF |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
DICOM-RLE
DICOM-RLE Strengths
- Guarantees lossless preservation of critical medical data necessary for diagnostics
- Extremely robust metadata structure containing patient information, modality, and spatial geometry
- Faster to encode and decode than complex compression schemes like JPEG 2000
Limitations
- RLE compression offers very low compression ratios compared to modern codecs like JPEG-LS or JPEG 2000
- Zero support in web browsers or standard consumer image viewers
- Strict data privacy regulations (HIPAA/GDPR) make handling DICOM files complex due to embedded PHI
Sony-SRF
Sony-SRF Strengths
- Retains perfectly raw, unprocessed sensor data from legacy early-2000s cameras, allowing modern raw processors to extract much better dynamic range and color than the camera's original internal JPEG engine could
- Utilizes a standard TIFF container structure, ensuring broad compatibility with community-maintained open-source decoding libraries like LibRaw
Limitations
- Completely obsolete format that has long been abandoned in favor of ARW
- MIME detection via magic bytes is unreliable due to TIFF header spoofing, requiring deeper EXIF inspection for accurate routing
- Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders
When to choose which format
DICOM-RLE
Use DICOM-RLE when…
- Medical Imaging
- Ultrasound
- X-Rays / CT / MRI
- PACS Archives
Sony-SRF
Use Sony-SRF when…
- Legacy Sony Cyber-shot Photography
- Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
- Early 2000s Raw Imaging Archival