Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
DICOM-RLE

DICOM Run-Length Encoding

image/dicom-rle
VS

SealedMedia Portable Network Graphics

image/vnd.sealed.png
Sealed-PNG

A complete technical comparison of DICOM Run-Length Encoding and SealedMedia Portable Network Graphics — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature DICOM-RLE Sealed-PNG
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
Extension
.dcm.dicom
Container DICOM (PS3.10)
Compression Lossless (RLE)
Algorithm
Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) / ACR
Released 1993
Magic Bytes
44 49 43 4D (at byte offset 128)
Full DICOM-RLE reference →
SealedMedia Portable Network Graphics
image/vnd.sealed.png
Extension
.spng.sealed-png
Container SealedMedia / Oracle IRM Wrapper
Compression Encrypted Payload (Deflate)
Algorithm
AES EncryptionDeflate (Internal PNG payload)
Color Depth Encrypted Payload
Developed by SealedMedia (Acquired by Oracle Corporation)
Released Late 1990s / Early 2000s
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary SealedMedia Container)
Full Sealed-PNG reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser DICOM-RLE Sealed-PNG
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
DICOM-RLE

DICOM-RLE Strengths

  • Guarantees lossless preservation of critical medical data necessary for diagnostics
  • Extremely robust metadata structure containing patient information, modality, and spatial geometry
  • Faster to encode and decode than complex compression schemes like JPEG 2000
Limitations
  • RLE compression offers very low compression ratios compared to modern codecs like JPEG-LS or JPEG 2000
  • Zero support in web browsers or standard consumer image viewers
  • Strict data privacy regulations (HIPAA/GDPR) make handling DICOM files complex due to embedded PHI
Sealed-PNG

Sealed-PNG Strengths

  • Provided absolute control over intellectual property, allowing enterprise administrators to instantly revoke viewing rights of a local file globally
  • Detailed audit trails tracked exactly who opened the image, when, and from what IP address
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and relies on a central authentication server; if the server goes offline, the image is permanently inaccessible
  • No support in modern operating systems, web browsers, or standard image editing software without installing heavy enterprise DRM clients
  • Oracle effectively deprecated the IRM product line, leaving legacy sealed documents difficult to recover

When to choose which format

DICOM-RLE
Use DICOM-RLE when…
  • Medical Imaging
  • Ultrasound
  • X-Rays / CT / MRI
  • PACS Archives
Sealed-PNG
Use Sealed-PNG when…
  • Enterprise Information Rights Management (IRM)
  • Secure Corporate Intellectual Property Distribution
  • Revocable Medical or Legal Imaging

More comparisons

DICOM-RLE vs ACES → Sealed-PNG vs ACES → DICOM-RLE vs APNG → Sealed-PNG vs APNG → DICOM-RLE vs AVCI → Sealed-PNG vs AVCI → DICOM-RLE vs AVCS → Sealed-PNG vs AVCS → DICOM-RLE vs AVIF → Sealed-PNG vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison