Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
DICOM-RLE

DICOM Run-Length Encoding

image/dicom-rle
VS

Panasonic RAW Image

image/x-panasonic-raw
Panasonic-RAW-(RW2)

A complete technical comparison of DICOM Run-Length Encoding and Panasonic RAW Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature DICOM-RLE Panasonic-RAW-(RW2)
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
Extension
.dcm.dicom
Container DICOM (PS3.10)
Compression Lossless (RLE)
Algorithm
Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) / ACR
Released 1993
Magic Bytes
44 49 43 4D (at byte offset 128)
Full DICOM-RLE reference →
Panasonic RAW Image
image/x-panasonic-raw
Extension
.raw.rw2
Container TIFF-based (Proprietary)
Compression Uncompressed / Panasonic Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
NoneProprietary Lossless
Color Depth 12-bit (Per Channel), 14-bit (Per Channel), 16-bit (Per Channel - High-res mode)
Developed by Panasonic Corporation
Released 2004
Magic Bytes
Older RAW: 49 49 2A 00 | Newer RW2: 49 49 55 00
Full Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser DICOM-RLE Panasonic-RAW-(RW2)
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
DICOM-RLE

DICOM-RLE Strengths

  • Guarantees lossless preservation of critical medical data necessary for diagnostics
  • Extremely robust metadata structure containing patient information, modality, and spatial geometry
  • Faster to encode and decode than complex compression schemes like JPEG 2000
Limitations
  • RLE compression offers very low compression ratios compared to modern codecs like JPEG-LS or JPEG 2000
  • Zero support in web browsers or standard consumer image viewers
  • Strict data privacy regulations (HIPAA/GDPR) make handling DICOM files complex due to embedded PHI
Panasonic-RAW-(RW2)

Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) Strengths

  • Retains maximum sensor data, allowing significant recovery of highlights and shadows compared to in-camera JPEGs
  • Modern RW2 files embed proprietary lens correction profiles (distortion, vignetting, chromatic aberration) that raw converters can automatically apply
  • The unique 'IIU' signature on RW2 files makes programmatic identification extremely reliable compared to other TIFF-spoofing raw formats
Limitations
  • Proprietary format requires continuous updates to third-party processing engines whenever Panasonic releases a new Lumix camera
  • Produces very large file sizes, particularly when using Panasonic's High-Resolution multi-shot modes
  • Cannot be directly embedded into web pages or used in standard HTML/CSS contexts

When to choose which format

DICOM-RLE
Use DICOM-RLE when…
  • Medical Imaging
  • Ultrasound
  • X-Rays / CT / MRI
  • PACS Archives
Panasonic-RAW-(RW2)
Use Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Lumix Archival

More comparisons

DICOM-RLE vs ACES → Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) vs ACES → DICOM-RLE vs APNG → Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) vs APNG → DICOM-RLE vs AVCI → Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) vs AVCI → DICOM-RLE vs AVCS → Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) vs AVCS → DICOM-RLE vs AVIF → Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison