Image MIME Reference
DICOM-RLE
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
VS
JPEG Network Graphics
image/x-jng
JNG
A complete technical comparison of DICOM Run-Length Encoding and JPEG Network Graphics — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | DICOM-RLE | JNG |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | Yes |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
Extension
.dcm.dicom
Container
DICOM (PS3.10)
Compression
Lossless (RLE)
Algorithm
Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by
National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) / ACR
Released
1993
Magic Bytes
44 49 43 4D (at byte offset 128)
JPEG Network Graphics
image/x-jng
Extension
.jng
Container
PNG-style Chunk Structure (JHDR, JDAT, IDAT, IEND)
Compression
Lossy (JPEG/DCT for color) / Lossless (Deflate for alpha mask)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)Deflate (LZ77)
Color Depth
8-bit, 12-bit, 24-bit (RGB), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by
MNG Development Group (Glenn Randers-Pehrson et al.)
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
8B 4A 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | DICOM-RLE | JNG |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
DICOM-RLE
DICOM-RLE Strengths
- Guarantees lossless preservation of critical medical data necessary for diagnostics
- Extremely robust metadata structure containing patient information, modality, and spatial geometry
- Faster to encode and decode than complex compression schemes like JPEG 2000
Limitations
- RLE compression offers very low compression ratios compared to modern codecs like JPEG-LS or JPEG 2000
- Zero support in web browsers or standard consumer image viewers
- Strict data privacy regulations (HIPAA/GDPR) make handling DICOM files complex due to embedded PHI
JNG
JNG Strengths
- Solved a massive technical hurdle in the early 2000s by combining high-compression lossy photographic data with crisp, 8-bit alpha transparency
- Utilized the highly robust, extensible chunk-based architecture of the PNG format
- Provided an excellent, bandwidth-saving alternative to massive 32-bit transparent PNGs for web design
Limitations
- Failed to achieve critical mass; browser vendors largely abandoned the MNG/JNG standard due to implementation complexity
- Completely obsolete today, having been superseded by natively supported, superior formats like WebP, AVIF, and HEIC
- Decoding requires a hybrid engine that can parse PNG chunks while simultaneously decoding a JPEG stream and a Deflate stream, complicating software support
When to choose which format
DICOM-RLE
Use DICOM-RLE when…
- Medical Imaging
- Ultrasound
- X-Rays / CT / MRI
- PACS Archives
JNG
Use JNG when…
- Embedded frames in MNG animations
- Historical web graphics requiring lossy compression with transparency