Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
DGN

MicroStation Design File

image/x-vnd.dgn
VS

X Pixmap

image/x-xpixmap
XPM

A complete technical comparison of MicroStation Design File and X Pixmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature DGN XPM
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
MicroStation Design File
image/x-vnd.dgn
Extension
.dgn
Container Microsoft OLE Compound File (V8) / IGDS (V7)
Compression Uncompressed / OLE Structured Storage
Algorithm
None
Color Depth Indexed Color (V7), 24-bit True Color (V8)
Developed by Intergraph (Originally) / Bentley Systems (Currently)
Released 1980
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1 (For V8 DGN)
Full DGN reference →
X Pixmap
image/x-xpixmap
Extension
.xpm
Container C Source Code Header (.c / .h)
Compression Uncompressed (Source Code)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth Indexed Color (Custom Palette with RGB and Alpha 'None')
Developed by Daniel Dardailler and Colas Nahaboo (Bull / X Consortium)
Released 1989
Magic Bytes
2F 2A 20 58 50 4D 20 2A 2F (ASCII '/* XPM */')
Full XPM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser DGN XPM
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕
✓
DGN

DGN Strengths

  • Exceptionally robust at handling massive, coordinate-heavy infrastructure models that would frequently crash older versions of competing CAD software
  • Deeply entrenched as the absolute standard format for many global departments of transportation and civil engineering firms
  • V8 architecture supports boundless design plane coordinates, eliminating the physical scaling limitations of V7
Limitations
  • Deeply proprietary format requiring complex third-party libraries (like the ODA SDK) to parse or write programmatically outside of the Bentley ecosystem
  • V8's reliance on the archaic Microsoft OLE Compound File container makes file introspection cumbersome
  • Cannot be rendered natively in web browsers without converting to WebGL/Canvas formats or SVG
XPM

XPM Strengths

  • Can be compiled directly into C or C++ source code without requiring an external asset loading mechanism
  • Human-readable palette mapping allows developers to inspect, modify, or hand-craft icons directly within a text editor
  • Native support for color palettes and transparency via the 'None' keyword
Limitations
  • Extremely inefficient storage structure for large images, resulting in massive file bloat compared to binary formats like PNG
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web browsers
  • Parsing overhead requires compiling or interpreting text-based color tables at runtime

When to choose which format

DGN
Use DGN when…
  • Civil Engineering and Plant Design
  • Large-scale Architecture and Construction (AEC)
  • 2D/3D Infrastructure Modeling
XPM
Use XPM when…
  • X Window System (X11) Application Icons and Cursors
  • Embedded C/C++ Firmware Color UI Assets
  • Early Linux Desktop Environment Themes

More comparisons

DGN vs ACES → XPM vs ACES → DGN vs APNG → XPM vs APNG → DGN vs AVCI → XPM vs AVCI → DGN vs AVCS → XPM vs AVCS → DGN vs AVIF → XPM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison