Image MIME Reference
DGN
MicroStation Design File
image/x-vnd.dgn
VS
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI
A complete technical comparison of MicroStation Design File and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | DGN | MODI |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
MicroStation Design File
image/x-vnd.dgn
Extension
.dgn
Container
Microsoft OLE Compound File (V8) / IGDS (V7)
Compression
Uncompressed / OLE Structured Storage
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
Indexed Color (V7), 24-bit True Color (V8)
Developed by
Intergraph (Originally) / Bentley Systems (Currently)
Released
1980
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1 (For V8 DGN)
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | DGN | MODI |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
DGN
DGN Strengths
- Exceptionally robust at handling massive, coordinate-heavy infrastructure models that would frequently crash older versions of competing CAD software
- Deeply entrenched as the absolute standard format for many global departments of transportation and civil engineering firms
- V8 architecture supports boundless design plane coordinates, eliminating the physical scaling limitations of V7
Limitations
- Deeply proprietary format requiring complex third-party libraries (like the ODA SDK) to parse or write programmatically outside of the Bentley ecosystem
- V8's reliance on the archaic Microsoft OLE Compound File container makes file introspection cumbersome
- Cannot be rendered natively in web browsers without converting to WebGL/Canvas formats or SVG
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
When to choose which format
DGN
Use DGN when…
- Civil Engineering and Plant Design
- Large-scale Architecture and Construction (AEC)
- 2D/3D Infrastructure Modeling
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage