Image MIME Reference
DGN
MicroStation Design File
image/x-vnd.dgn
VS
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/jphc
HTJ2K-Codestream
A complete technical comparison of MicroStation Design File and High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | DGN | HTJ2K-Codestream |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
MicroStation Design File
image/x-vnd.dgn
Extension
.dgn
Container
Microsoft OLE Compound File (V8) / IGDS (V7)
Compression
Uncompressed / OLE Structured Storage
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
Indexed Color (V7), 24-bit True Color (V8)
Developed by
Intergraph (Originally) / Bentley Systems (Currently)
Released
1980
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1 (For V8 DGN)
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/jphc
Extension
.jhc
Container
None (Raw Codestream)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
FF 4F FF 51
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | DGN | HTJ2K-Codestream |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
DGN
DGN Strengths
- Exceptionally robust at handling massive, coordinate-heavy infrastructure models that would frequently crash older versions of competing CAD software
- Deeply entrenched as the absolute standard format for many global departments of transportation and civil engineering firms
- V8 architecture supports boundless design plane coordinates, eliminating the physical scaling limitations of V7
Limitations
- Deeply proprietary format requiring complex third-party libraries (like the ODA SDK) to parse or write programmatically outside of the Bentley ecosystem
- V8's reliance on the archaic Microsoft OLE Compound File container makes file introspection cumbersome
- Cannot be rendered natively in web browsers without converting to WebGL/Canvas formats or SVG
HTJ2K-Codestream
HTJ2K-Codestream Strengths
- Extremely fast encoding and decoding capabilities due to the parallelizable block coder
- Minimal file overhead since it lacks container headers and metadata
- Ideal for streaming applications or embedded systems where parsing a full container is unnecessary
Limitations
- Lacks standard metadata support (like EXIF, XMP, or ICC color profiles) since there is no container structure
- Zero native web browser compatibility
- Difficult to distinguish from standard JPEG 2000 codestreams without deeply parsing the internal marker segments
When to choose which format
DGN
Use DGN when…
- Civil Engineering and Plant Design
- Large-scale Architecture and Construction (AEC)
- 2D/3D Infrastructure Modeling
HTJ2K-Codestream
Use HTJ2K-Codestream when…
- Medical Imaging Pipelines
- Geospatial Data Streaming
- Digital Cinema
- Embedded Systems