Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
DGN

MicroStation Design File

image/x-vnd.dgn
VS

Flexible Image Transport System

image/fits
FITS

A complete technical comparison of MicroStation Design File and Flexible Image Transport System — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature DGN FITS
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
MicroStation Design File
image/x-vnd.dgn
Extension
.dgn
Container Microsoft OLE Compound File (V8) / IGDS (V7)
Compression Uncompressed / OLE Structured Storage
Algorithm
None
Color Depth Indexed Color (V7), 24-bit True Color (V8)
Developed by Intergraph (Originally) / Bentley Systems (Currently)
Released 1980
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1 (For V8 DGN)
Full DGN reference →
Flexible Image Transport System
image/fits
Extension
.fits.fit.fts
Container FITS
Compression Uncompressed / Tile Compressed (Rice, GZIP)
Algorithm
UncompressedRiceGZIPHcompress
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 64-bit (Float/Double)
Developed by IAU FITS Working Group / NASA
Released 1981
Magic Bytes
53 49 4D 50 4C 45 20 20 3D 20
Full FITS reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser DGN FITS
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
DGN

DGN Strengths

  • Exceptionally robust at handling massive, coordinate-heavy infrastructure models that would frequently crash older versions of competing CAD software
  • Deeply entrenched as the absolute standard format for many global departments of transportation and civil engineering firms
  • V8 architecture supports boundless design plane coordinates, eliminating the physical scaling limitations of V7
Limitations
  • Deeply proprietary format requiring complex third-party libraries (like the ODA SDK) to parse or write programmatically outside of the Bentley ecosystem
  • V8's reliance on the archaic Microsoft OLE Compound File container makes file introspection cumbersome
  • Cannot be rendered natively in web browsers without converting to WebGL/Canvas formats or SVG
FITS

FITS Strengths

  • The undisputed global standard for archiving and sharing astronomical data
  • Self-documenting: Headers are written in plain ASCII, ensuring data is readable decades later regardless of software
  • Supports incredibly high dynamic range, N-dimensional arrays, and complex binary tables
Limitations
  • No support in standard consumer software or web browsers
  • Uncompressed raw FITS files from modern telescopes can be excessively large
  • Does not use standard metadata models like EXIF or XMP, requiring specialized parsers

When to choose which format

DGN
Use DGN when…
  • Civil Engineering and Plant Design
  • Large-scale Architecture and Construction (AEC)
  • 2D/3D Infrastructure Modeling
FITS
Use FITS when…
  • Astronomy & Astrophysics
  • Space Telescope Data (Hubble, JWST)
  • Scientific Data Archiving
  • Spectroscopy

More comparisons

DGN vs ACES → FITS vs ACES → DGN vs APNG → FITS vs APNG → DGN vs AVCI → FITS vs AVCI → DGN vs AVCS → FITS vs AVCS → DGN vs AVIF → FITS vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison