Image MIME Reference
DGN
MicroStation Design File
image/x-vnd.dgn
VS
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
DICOM-RLE
A complete technical comparison of MicroStation Design File and DICOM Run-Length Encoding — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | DGN | DICOM-RLE |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
MicroStation Design File
image/x-vnd.dgn
Extension
.dgn
Container
Microsoft OLE Compound File (V8) / IGDS (V7)
Compression
Uncompressed / OLE Structured Storage
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
Indexed Color (V7), 24-bit True Color (V8)
Developed by
Intergraph (Originally) / Bentley Systems (Currently)
Released
1980
Magic Bytes
D0 CF 11 E0 A1 B1 1A E1 (For V8 DGN)
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
Extension
.dcm.dicom
Container
DICOM (PS3.10)
Compression
Lossless (RLE)
Algorithm
Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by
National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) / ACR
Released
1993
Magic Bytes
44 49 43 4D (at byte offset 128)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | DGN | DICOM-RLE |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
DGN
DGN Strengths
- Exceptionally robust at handling massive, coordinate-heavy infrastructure models that would frequently crash older versions of competing CAD software
- Deeply entrenched as the absolute standard format for many global departments of transportation and civil engineering firms
- V8 architecture supports boundless design plane coordinates, eliminating the physical scaling limitations of V7
Limitations
- Deeply proprietary format requiring complex third-party libraries (like the ODA SDK) to parse or write programmatically outside of the Bentley ecosystem
- V8's reliance on the archaic Microsoft OLE Compound File container makes file introspection cumbersome
- Cannot be rendered natively in web browsers without converting to WebGL/Canvas formats or SVG
DICOM-RLE
DICOM-RLE Strengths
- Guarantees lossless preservation of critical medical data necessary for diagnostics
- Extremely robust metadata structure containing patient information, modality, and spatial geometry
- Faster to encode and decode than complex compression schemes like JPEG 2000
Limitations
- RLE compression offers very low compression ratios compared to modern codecs like JPEG-LS or JPEG 2000
- Zero support in web browsers or standard consumer image viewers
- Strict data privacy regulations (HIPAA/GDPR) make handling DICOM files complex due to embedded PHI
When to choose which format
DGN
Use DGN when…
- Civil Engineering and Plant Design
- Large-scale Architecture and Construction (AEC)
- 2D/3D Infrastructure Modeling
DICOM-RLE
Use DICOM-RLE when…
- Medical Imaging
- Ultrasound
- X-Rays / CT / MRI
- PACS Archives