Image MIME Reference
DDS
DirectDraw Surface
image/vnd.ms-dds
VS
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI
A complete technical comparison of DirectDraw Surface and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | DDS | MODI |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
DirectDraw Surface
image/vnd.ms-dds
Extension
.dds
Container
DirectDraw Surface
Compression
Block Compression (BC1-BC7) / DXTC / S3TC / Uncompressed (RGBA, Floating-Point)
Algorithm
DXT1-DXT5BC1-BC7ASTC / ETC2 (Extended)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit, 32-bit (RGBA), 16-bit/32-bit Floating Point (HDR)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
44 44 53 20
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | DDS | MODI |
|---|---|---|
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
|
|
✕ | ✕ |
DDS
DDS Strengths
- Massively reduces VRAM footprint and memory bandwidth usage because the GPU decodes the block compression in hardware
- Encapsulates complex texture arrays, volume textures, cubemaps, and entire mipmap chains within a single, highly structured file
- Supports high-dynamic-range (HDR) floating-point data for modern physically based rendering (PBR)
Limitations
- Block compression algorithms (like DXT) are lossy and can introduce ugly blocky artifacts, especially in smooth gradients or normal maps if not tuned properly
- Files are generally larger on the physical hard drive than highly compressed formats like PNG or WebP
- Zero support in web browsers or standard consumer image viewers
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
When to choose which format
DDS
Use DDS when…
- Real-Time 3D Game Textures
- DirectX and Vulkan Rendering Pipelines
- Skyboxes and Environment Cubemaps
- Volume Textures (3D Textures)
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage