Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
DDS

DirectDraw Surface

image/vnd.ms-dds
VS

Flexible Image Transport System

image/fits
FITS

A complete technical comparison of DirectDraw Surface and Flexible Image Transport System — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature DDS FITS
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
DirectDraw Surface
image/vnd.ms-dds
Extension
.dds
Container DirectDraw Surface
Compression Block Compression (BC1-BC7) / DXTC / S3TC / Uncompressed (RGBA, Floating-Point)
Algorithm
DXT1-DXT5BC1-BC7ASTC / ETC2 (Extended)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit, 32-bit (RGBA), 16-bit/32-bit Floating Point (HDR)
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 1999
Magic Bytes
44 44 53 20
Full DDS reference →
Flexible Image Transport System
image/fits
Extension
.fits.fit.fts
Container FITS
Compression Uncompressed / Tile Compressed (Rice, GZIP)
Algorithm
UncompressedRiceGZIPHcompress
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 64-bit (Float/Double)
Developed by IAU FITS Working Group / NASA
Released 1981
Magic Bytes
53 49 4D 50 4C 45 20 20 3D 20
Full FITS reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser DDS FITS
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
DDS

DDS Strengths

  • Massively reduces VRAM footprint and memory bandwidth usage because the GPU decodes the block compression in hardware
  • Encapsulates complex texture arrays, volume textures, cubemaps, and entire mipmap chains within a single, highly structured file
  • Supports high-dynamic-range (HDR) floating-point data for modern physically based rendering (PBR)
Limitations
  • Block compression algorithms (like DXT) are lossy and can introduce ugly blocky artifacts, especially in smooth gradients or normal maps if not tuned properly
  • Files are generally larger on the physical hard drive than highly compressed formats like PNG or WebP
  • Zero support in web browsers or standard consumer image viewers
FITS

FITS Strengths

  • The undisputed global standard for archiving and sharing astronomical data
  • Self-documenting: Headers are written in plain ASCII, ensuring data is readable decades later regardless of software
  • Supports incredibly high dynamic range, N-dimensional arrays, and complex binary tables
Limitations
  • No support in standard consumer software or web browsers
  • Uncompressed raw FITS files from modern telescopes can be excessively large
  • Does not use standard metadata models like EXIF or XMP, requiring specialized parsers

When to choose which format

DDS
Use DDS when…
  • Real-Time 3D Game Textures
  • DirectX and Vulkan Rendering Pipelines
  • Skyboxes and Environment Cubemaps
  • Volume Textures (3D Textures)
FITS
Use FITS when…
  • Astronomy & Astrophysics
  • Space Telescope Data (Hubble, JWST)
  • Scientific Data Archiving
  • Spectroscopy

More comparisons

DDS vs ACES → FITS vs ACES → DDS vs APNG → FITS vs APNG → DDS vs AVCI → FITS vs AVCI → DDS vs AVCS → FITS vs AVCS → DDS vs AVIF → FITS vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison