Image MIME Reference
CNS-INF2
Comverse Network Systems INF2 Image
image/vnd.cns.inf2
VS
TIFF for Facsimile eXtended
image/tiff-fx
TIFF-FX
A complete technical comparison of Comverse Network Systems INF2 Image and TIFF for Facsimile eXtended — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | CNS-INF2 | TIFF-FX |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
Comverse Network Systems INF2 Image
image/vnd.cns.inf2
Extension
.inf2
Container
Proprietary Comverse Container
Compression
Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown (Proprietary Telecom Encoding)
Color Depth
Unknown
Developed by
Comverse Network Systems (Ann McLaughlin)
Released
1999
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
TIFF for Facsimile eXtended
image/tiff-fx
Extension
.tiff.tif
Container
TIFF 6.0 Tag Directory Structure
Compression
MH / MR / MMR (CCITT Group 3 & 4) / JBIG / JPEG
Algorithm
CCITT Group 3/4JBIGJPEG
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome B&W), 8-bit (Grayscale/Color Indexed), 24-bit (RGB Color)
Developed by
IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force)
Released
1998
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 (Little-Endian) / 4D 4D 00 2A (Big-Endian)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | CNS-INF2 | TIFF-FX |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
CNS-INF2
CNS-INF2 Strengths
- Historically allowed Comverse to standardize media transmission internally across their global telecom messaging platforms
Limitations
- Completely obsolete and non-functional outside of decommissioned telecom infrastructure
- Undocumented, closed-source binary structure
- Zero support in modern image processing libraries like ImageMagick, libvips, or FFmpeg
TIFF-FX
TIFF-FX Strengths
- Provides a universal, standardized format for transmitting multi-page documents over IP networks and email (Internet Fax)
- Supports highly efficient telecom-centric compression algorithms (MMR, JBIG) that produce very small files for text documents
- Maintains backwards compatibility with standard TIFF parsers
Limitations
- Not supported natively by web browsers
- Requires complex parsing of TIFF IFD tags to differentiate a true TIFF-FX file from a standard TIFF file
- Usage is slowly declining as traditional faxing is replaced by secure PDF transmission and e-signature platforms
When to choose which format
CNS-INF2
Use CNS-INF2 when…
- Legacy Telecom Infrastructure
- Historical Comverse Unified Messaging Systems
- Proprietary Server-to-Server Media Exchange
TIFF-FX
Use TIFF-FX when…
- Internet Fax (T.37)
- Enterprise Fax Servers
- Document Archiving
- Telecommunications