Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
CNS-INF2

Comverse Network Systems INF2 Image

image/vnd.cns.inf2
VS

PWG Raster Format

image/pwg-raster
PWG-Raster

A complete technical comparison of Comverse Network Systems INF2 Image and PWG Raster Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature CNS-INF2 PWG-Raster
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Comverse Network Systems INF2 Image
image/vnd.cns.inf2
Extension
.inf2
Container Proprietary Comverse Container
Compression Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown (Proprietary Telecom Encoding)
Color Depth Unknown
Developed by Comverse Network Systems (Ann McLaughlin)
Released 1999
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
Full CNS-INF2 reference →
PWG Raster Format
image/pwg-raster
Extension
.pwg.ras
Container CUPS Raster v2 Container
Compression PackBits (Run-Length Encoding)
Algorithm
PackBits (Apple RLE variant)
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome/K), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (sRGB / Adobe RGB), 32-bit (CMYK)
Developed by IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group (PWG)
Released 2011
Magic Bytes
52 61 53 32
Full PWG-Raster reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser CNS-INF2 PWG-Raster
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
CNS-INF2

CNS-INF2 Strengths

  • Historically allowed Comverse to standardize media transmission internally across their global telecom messaging platforms
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and non-functional outside of decommissioned telecom infrastructure
  • Undocumented, closed-source binary structure
  • Zero support in modern image processing libraries like ImageMagick, libvips, or FFmpeg
PWG-Raster

PWG-Raster Strengths

  • The undisputed global standard for modern, driverless printing environments, eliminating the nightmare of installing manufacturer-specific print drivers
  • Extremely lightweight to decode on embedded hardware, requiring minimal RAM buffers on the printer side
  • Strict color space and resolution rules guarantee that the printed output will successfully process without syntax errors
Limitations
  • Generates massive file sizes and network payloads compared to vector-based formats like PDF or PostScript, as every page is fully rasterized at 300+ DPI before transmission
  • No support for native rendering in web browsers, image viewers, or graphic design software without specialized CUPS developer tools
  • Cannot store complex metadata, vector text, or layers

When to choose which format

CNS-INF2
Use CNS-INF2 when…
  • Legacy Telecom Infrastructure
  • Historical Comverse Unified Messaging Systems
  • Proprietary Server-to-Server Media Exchange
PWG-Raster
Use PWG-Raster when…
  • Driverless Network Printing (IPP Everywhere)
  • Apple AirPrint and Mopria Print Service Pipelines
  • CUPS (Common UNIX Printing System) Spooling
Share this comparison