Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
CNS-INF2

Comverse Network Systems INF2 Image

image/vnd.cns.inf2
VS

JPEG 2000 Core Image File

image/jp2
JPEG-2000

A complete technical comparison of Comverse Network Systems INF2 Image and JPEG 2000 Core Image File — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

JPEG-2000 wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature CNS-INF2 JPEG-2000
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
Comverse Network Systems INF2 Image
image/vnd.cns.inf2
Extension
.inf2
Container Proprietary Comverse Container
Compression Proprietary
Algorithm
Unknown (Proprietary Telecom Encoding)
Color Depth Unknown
Developed by Comverse Network Systems (Ann McLaughlin)
Released 1999
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary)
Full CNS-INF2 reference →
JPEG 2000 Core Image File
image/jp2
Extension
.jp2.j2k.jpf.jpx.jpm
Container JP2 (ISO/IEC 15444-1)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group
Released 2000
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A
Full JPEG-2000 reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser CNS-INF2 JPEG-2000
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
✓ 5+
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
CNS-INF2

CNS-INF2 Strengths

  • Historically allowed Comverse to standardize media transmission internally across their global telecom messaging platforms
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and non-functional outside of decommissioned telecom infrastructure
  • Undocumented, closed-source binary structure
  • Zero support in modern image processing libraries like ImageMagick, libvips, or FFmpeg
JPEG-2000

JPEG-2000 Strengths

  • Superior compression efficiency over baseline JPEG without introducing blocking artifacts
  • True mathematically lossless compression available in the same format
  • Extremely scalable: a single file can be decoded at various resolutions (thumbnails to full size) without loading the entire file
Limitations
  • Very poor native web browser support prevents it from being a web standard
  • High computational complexity makes encoding and decoding significantly slower than JPEG
  • Early patent concerns and complex licensing hindered its initial adoption rate

When to choose which format

CNS-INF2
Use CNS-INF2 when…
  • Legacy Telecom Infrastructure
  • Historical Comverse Unified Messaging Systems
  • Proprietary Server-to-Server Media Exchange
JPEG-2000
Use JPEG-2000 when…
  • Digital Cinema (DCP)
  • Medical Imaging (DICOM)
  • Geospatial Data
  • Archival Preservation
Share this comparison