Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
CLIP

Clip Studio Paint Document

image/vnd.clip
VS

Portable Bitmap

image/x-portable-bitmap
PBM

A complete technical comparison of Clip Studio Paint Document and Portable Bitmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature CLIP PBM
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Clip Studio Paint Document
image/vnd.clip
Extension
.clip.lip
Container SQLite 3 Database
Compression Proprietary Blob Compression (within SQLite)
Algorithm
Proprietary (Celsys Blob Encoding)
Color Depth 8-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB), 32-bit (CMYK)
Developed by Celsys, Inc.
Released 2012
Magic Bytes
53 51 4C 69 74 65 20 66 6F 72 6D 61 74 20 33 00
Full CLIP reference →
Portable Bitmap
image/x-portable-bitmap
Extension
.pbm
Container Netpbm
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
50 31 (ASCII) or 50 34 (Binary)
Full PBM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser CLIP PBM
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
CLIP

CLIP Strengths

  • SQLite backend provides incredibly robust data integrity, preventing catastrophic project loss if the application crashes during a save
  • Allows for massive multi-page comic projects and animation timelines to be handled efficiently without loading the entire project into RAM simultaneously
  • Industry standard for manga, anime, and webtoon professional workflows
Limitations
  • Heavily closed-source and proprietary, meaning no third-party applications (like ImageMagick or GIMP) can parse or render the files
  • Standard MIME identification tools will misidentify the file as a generic SQLite database, causing friction in automated file-upload validations
  • Zero web browser support
PBM

PBM Strengths

  • Absolute structural simplicity allows parsers to be written from scratch with just a few lines of code
  • ASCII encoding allows manual editing and debugging directly within a standard text editor
  • Serves as a flawless, lossless intermediary for 1-bit raster data like scanned documents or barcodes
Limitations
  • Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome images; cannot natively display shades of gray or color
  • Lack of compression results in extremely large file sizes, particularly when using the ASCII 'P1' encoding
  • No support for alpha transparency or modern metadata standards like EXIF

When to choose which format

CLIP
Use CLIP when…
  • Digital Illustration and Concept Art
  • Manga and Webtoon Production
  • 2D Frame-by-Frame Animation
  • High-Resolution Print Production
PBM
Use PBM when…
  • Optical Character Recognition (OCR) Pre-processing
  • Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Pipelines
  • Academic Image Processing Teaching

More comparisons

CLIP vs ACES → PBM vs ACES → CLIP vs APNG → PBM vs APNG → CLIP vs AVCI → PBM vs AVCI → CLIP vs AVCS → PBM vs AVCS → CLIP vs AVIF → PBM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison