Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
CGM

Computer Graphics Metafile

image/cgm
VS

WebP Image

image/webp
WebP

A complete technical comparison of Computer Graphics Metafile and WebP Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

WebP wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature CGM WebP
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No Yes
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
Computer Graphics Metafile
image/cgm
Extension
.cgm
Container CGM
Compression Uncompressed / Binary / Character / Clear Text
Algorithm
Deflate (in some WebCGM profiles)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit, 32-bit
Developed by ISO / IEC
Released 1987
Magic Bytes
00 20 (Binary) / 42 45 47 49 4E 20 4D 45 54 41 46 49 4C 45 (Clear Text)
Full CGM reference →
WebP Image
image/webp
Extension
.webp
Container RIFF
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
VP8VP8L
Color Depth 8-bit
Developed by Google
Released 2010
Magic Bytes
52 49 46 46 XX XX XX XX 57 45 42 50
Full WebP reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser CGM WebP
Chrome Chrome
✕
✓ 32+
Firefox Firefox
✕
✓ 65+
Safari Safari
✕
✓ 14+
Edge Edge
✕
✓ 18+
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
CGM

CGM Strengths

  • Strictly standardized by ISO, ensuring long-term archiving and cross-platform compatibility in engineering
  • Excellent support for rich metadata, hyperlinks, and technical hotspots via the WebCGM profile
  • Can store complex 2D geometry, rasters, and text in a single lightweight file
Limitations
  • Multiple encoding schemes (Binary, Character, Clear Text) make parser development difficult
  • Zero native support in modern web browsers without third-party plugins
  • Largely replaced by SVG for general-purpose 2D vector graphics on the web
WebP

WebP Strengths

  • Superior lossy compression — 25–35% smaller than JPEG at equivalent quality
  • Supports both animation and full alpha transparency
  • Lossless mode available with smaller file sizes than PNG
Limitations
  • Slower encoding than JPEG, especially for lossless
  • Not supported in Internet Explorer or very old browsers

When to choose which format

CGM
Use CGM when…
  • Technical Illustrations
  • Aerospace & Defense (S1000D)
  • CAD/CAM
  • Geophysics
WebP
Use WebP when…
  • Websites
  • Ecommerce
  • Mobile Apps
  • CMS Images

More comparisons

CGM vs ACES → WebP vs ACES → CGM vs APNG → WebP vs APNG → CGM vs AVCI → WebP vs AVCI → CGM vs AVCS → WebP vs AVCS → CGM vs AVIF → WebP vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison