Image MIME Reference
CGM
Computer Graphics Metafile
image/cgm
VS
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI
A complete technical comparison of Computer Graphics Metafile and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | CGM | MODI |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
Computer Graphics Metafile
image/cgm
Extension
.cgm
Container
CGM
Compression
Uncompressed / Binary / Character / Clear Text
Algorithm
Deflate (in some WebCGM profiles)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit, 32-bit
Developed by
ISO / IEC
Released
1987
Magic Bytes
00 20 (Binary) / 42 45 47 49 4E 20 4D 45 54 41 46 49 4C 45 (Clear Text)
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | CGM | MODI |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
CGM
CGM Strengths
- Strictly standardized by ISO, ensuring long-term archiving and cross-platform compatibility in engineering
- Excellent support for rich metadata, hyperlinks, and technical hotspots via the WebCGM profile
- Can store complex 2D geometry, rasters, and text in a single lightweight file
Limitations
- Multiple encoding schemes (Binary, Character, Clear Text) make parser development difficult
- Zero native support in modern web browsers without third-party plugins
- Largely replaced by SVG for general-purpose 2D vector graphics on the web
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
When to choose which format
CGM
Use CGM when…
- Technical Illustrations
- Aerospace & Defense (S1000D)
- CAD/CAM
- Geophysics
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage