Image MIME Reference
CGM
Computer Graphics Metafile
image/cgm
VS
JPEG Network Graphics
image/x-jng
JNG
A complete technical comparison of Computer Graphics Metafile and JPEG Network Graphics — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | CGM | JNG |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
Computer Graphics Metafile
image/cgm
Extension
.cgm
Container
CGM
Compression
Uncompressed / Binary / Character / Clear Text
Algorithm
Deflate (in some WebCGM profiles)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit, 32-bit
Developed by
ISO / IEC
Released
1987
Magic Bytes
00 20 (Binary) / 42 45 47 49 4E 20 4D 45 54 41 46 49 4C 45 (Clear Text)
JPEG Network Graphics
image/x-jng
Extension
.jng
Container
PNG-style Chunk Structure (JHDR, JDAT, IDAT, IEND)
Compression
Lossy (JPEG/DCT for color) / Lossless (Deflate for alpha mask)
Algorithm
JPEG (Discrete Cosine Transform)Deflate (LZ77)
Color Depth
8-bit, 12-bit, 24-bit (RGB), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by
MNG Development Group (Glenn Randers-Pehrson et al.)
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
8B 4A 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | CGM | JNG |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
CGM
CGM Strengths
- Strictly standardized by ISO, ensuring long-term archiving and cross-platform compatibility in engineering
- Excellent support for rich metadata, hyperlinks, and technical hotspots via the WebCGM profile
- Can store complex 2D geometry, rasters, and text in a single lightweight file
Limitations
- Multiple encoding schemes (Binary, Character, Clear Text) make parser development difficult
- Zero native support in modern web browsers without third-party plugins
- Largely replaced by SVG for general-purpose 2D vector graphics on the web
JNG
JNG Strengths
- Solved a massive technical hurdle in the early 2000s by combining high-compression lossy photographic data with crisp, 8-bit alpha transparency
- Utilized the highly robust, extensible chunk-based architecture of the PNG format
- Provided an excellent, bandwidth-saving alternative to massive 32-bit transparent PNGs for web design
Limitations
- Failed to achieve critical mass; browser vendors largely abandoned the MNG/JNG standard due to implementation complexity
- Completely obsolete today, having been superseded by natively supported, superior formats like WebP, AVIF, and HEIC
- Decoding requires a hybrid engine that can parse PNG chunks while simultaneously decoding a JPEG stream and a Deflate stream, complicating software support
When to choose which format
CGM
Use CGM when…
- Technical Illustrations
- Aerospace & Defense (S1000D)
- CAD/CAM
- Geophysics
JNG
Use JNG when…
- Embedded frames in MNG animations
- Historical web graphics requiring lossy compression with transparency