Image MIME Reference
CGM
Computer Graphics Metafile
image/cgm
VS
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/jphc
HTJ2K-Codestream
A complete technical comparison of Computer Graphics Metafile and High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | CGM | HTJ2K-Codestream |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | ✕ No |
Computer Graphics Metafile
image/cgm
Extension
.cgm
Container
CGM
Compression
Uncompressed / Binary / Character / Clear Text
Algorithm
Deflate (in some WebCGM profiles)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit, 32-bit
Developed by
ISO / IEC
Released
1987
Magic Bytes
00 20 (Binary) / 42 45 47 49 4E 20 4D 45 54 41 46 49 4C 45 (Clear Text)
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/jphc
Extension
.jhc
Container
None (Raw Codestream)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
FF 4F FF 51
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | CGM | HTJ2K-Codestream |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
CGM
CGM Strengths
- Strictly standardized by ISO, ensuring long-term archiving and cross-platform compatibility in engineering
- Excellent support for rich metadata, hyperlinks, and technical hotspots via the WebCGM profile
- Can store complex 2D geometry, rasters, and text in a single lightweight file
Limitations
- Multiple encoding schemes (Binary, Character, Clear Text) make parser development difficult
- Zero native support in modern web browsers without third-party plugins
- Largely replaced by SVG for general-purpose 2D vector graphics on the web
HTJ2K-Codestream
HTJ2K-Codestream Strengths
- Extremely fast encoding and decoding capabilities due to the parallelizable block coder
- Minimal file overhead since it lacks container headers and metadata
- Ideal for streaming applications or embedded systems where parsing a full container is unnecessary
Limitations
- Lacks standard metadata support (like EXIF, XMP, or ICC color profiles) since there is no container structure
- Zero native web browser compatibility
- Difficult to distinguish from standard JPEG 2000 codestreams without deeply parsing the internal marker segments
When to choose which format
CGM
Use CGM when…
- Technical Illustrations
- Aerospace & Defense (S1000D)
- CAD/CAM
- Geophysics
HTJ2K-Codestream
Use HTJ2K-Codestream when…
- Medical Imaging Pipelines
- Geospatial Data Streaming
- Digital Cinema
- Embedded Systems