Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
Canon-CR2

Canon Raw Version 2

image/x-canon-cr2
VS

High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream

image/jphc
HTJ2K-Codestream

A complete technical comparison of Canon Raw Version 2 and High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Canon-CR2 HTJ2K-Codestream
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support Yes Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Canon Raw Version 2
image/x-canon-cr2
Extension
.cr2
Container TIFF
Compression Lossless JPEG (ITU-T81)
Algorithm
Lossless JPEG (ITU-T81)
Color Depth 12-bit (Per Channel), 14-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Canon Inc.
Released 2004
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 10 00 00 00 43 52 02 00
Full Canon-CR2 reference →
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/jphc
Extension
.jhc
Container None (Raw Codestream)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
FF 4F FF 51
Full HTJ2K-Codestream reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Canon-CR2 HTJ2K-Codestream
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
Canon-CR2

Canon-CR2 Strengths

  • Retains maximum sensor data, allowing extreme recovery of highlights and shadows that would be permanently lost in a JPEG
  • White balance and color profiling are not 'baked in', meaning they can be completely altered in post-production without degrading the image
  • Lossless compression ensures perfect pixel accuracy while reducing file size compared to fully uncompressed formats
Limitations
  • Proprietary format means it requires constant updates to raw processing engines (like Adobe Camera Raw) every time Canon releases a new camera model
  • Produces very large file sizes (often 20MB to 40MB per image depending on sensor resolution)
  • Cannot be directly embedded into web pages or used in standard HTML/CSS contexts
HTJ2K-Codestream

HTJ2K-Codestream Strengths

  • Extremely fast encoding and decoding capabilities due to the parallelizable block coder
  • Minimal file overhead since it lacks container headers and metadata
  • Ideal for streaming applications or embedded systems where parsing a full container is unnecessary
Limitations
  • Lacks standard metadata support (like EXIF, XMP, or ICC color profiles) since there is no container structure
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Difficult to distinguish from standard JPEG 2000 codestreams without deeply parsing the internal marker segments

When to choose which format

Canon-CR2
Use Canon-CR2 when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Imaging Archival
HTJ2K-Codestream
Use HTJ2K-Codestream when…
  • Medical Imaging Pipelines
  • Geospatial Data Streaming
  • Digital Cinema
  • Embedded Systems
Share this comparison