Image MIME Reference
BTIF
Bank Telecommunications Image Format
image/prs.btif
VS
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
MODI
A complete technical comparison of Bank Telecommunications Image Format and Microsoft Document Imaging — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | BTIF | MODI |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Bank Telecommunications Image Format
image/prs.btif
Extension
.btif.btf
Container
Proprietary Check Image Container
Compression
Lossy (JPEG-based) / Lossless (TIFF-based)
Algorithm
JPEGTIFF-variant
Color Depth
1-bit (B&W), 8-bit (Grayscale)
Developed by
NationsBank (Bank of America) / Ben Simon
Released
1998
Magic Bytes
Unknown (Proprietary container)
Microsoft Document Imaging
image/vnd.ms-modi
Extension
.mdi
Container
TIFF Variant
Compression
LZW / Proprietary MS Compression
Algorithm
LZW (Modified)
Color Depth
1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by
Microsoft Corporation
Released
2001
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | BTIF | MODI |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
BTIF
BTIF Strengths
- Allowed early digital archiving and web-based transmission of cleared bank checks
- Encapsulated both image data and ASCII transaction metadata in a single file
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete format
- Lacks native support in modern operating systems and image viewers
- Requires legacy plugins or specialized bio-format readers (like ImageC) to decode
MODI
MODI Strengths
- Historically provided an excellent all-in-one scanned document format with built-in OCR and annotations before PDF editing became universally accessible
- Tightly integrated with Microsoft Office and SharePoint workflows in the early 2000s
Limitations
- Completely proprietary and obsolete; Microsoft abandoned it in favor of standard TIFF and PDF
- Causes widespread identification conflicts since its file signature is identical to a standard TIFF
- Extremely difficult to open on modern operating systems without relying on third-party conversion utilities
When to choose which format
BTIF
Use BTIF when…
- Bank Check Archiving (Legacy)
- Financial Transaction Records
MODI
Use MODI when…
- Legacy Scanned Document Archival
- Microsoft Office XP/2003/2007 Workflows
- Embedded OCR Text Storage