Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
AVCI

AVC Image (HEIF Container)

image/avci
VS

Silicon Graphics Image

image/sgi
SGI

A complete technical comparison of AVC Image (HEIF Container) and Silicon Graphics Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature AVCI SGI
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
AVC Image (HEIF Container)
image/avci
Extension
.avci.hif
Container HEIF / ISOBMFF (ISO/IEC 14496-12)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
AVC (Advanced Video Coding / H.264)
Color Depth 8-bit, 10-bit, 12-bit
Developed by Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) / ISO/IEC JTC 1
Released 2015
Magic Bytes
XX XX XX XX 66 74 79 70 61 76 63 69
Full AVCI reference →
Silicon Graphics Image
image/sgi
Extension
.sgi.rgb.rgba.bw.int.inta
Container SGI Image Format
Compression Uncompressed / Lossless (Run-Length Encoding)
Algorithm
RLENone
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Paul Haeberli (Silicon Graphics)
Released 1990
Magic Bytes
01 DA
Full SGI reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser AVCI SGI
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
AVCI

AVCI Strengths

  • Shares the robust, flexible HEIF container architecture that allows for rich metadata, HDR, and depth maps.
  • Backed by the highly ubiquitous AVC (H.264) codec, which is widely supported in hardware decoding.
  • Supports rectangular cropping and rotation metadata without needing to re-encode the pixel data.
Limitations
  • No native support within web browsers for HTML rendering.
  • Inferior compression efficiency when compared to newer container formats like HEIC (HEVC) or AVIF (AV1).
  • Easily confused with HEIC and AVIF, which use the same base ISOBMFF container.
SGI

SGI Strengths

  • Pioneered multi-channel and 16-bit per channel imaging capabilities required for high-end 1990s visual effects
  • Extremely robust and simple header structure
  • Reliable Run-Length Encoding provided solid lossless compression for flat-shaded 3D renders
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete for modern web and application development
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Largely replaced by TIFF and OpenEXR in modern professional VFX and 3D pipelines

When to choose which format

AVCI
Use AVCI when…
  • Digital Photography
  • Camera Capture
  • Archival Storage
SGI
Use SGI when…
  • Legacy 3D Animation & VFX
  • Silicon Graphics IRIX Workflows
  • Historical CGI Archiving

More comparisons

AVCI vs ACES → SGI vs ACES → AVCI vs APNG → SGI vs APNG → AVCI vs AVCS → SGI vs AVCS → AVCI vs AVIF → SGI vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison