Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
APNG

Animated Portable Network Graphics

image/vnd.mozilla.apng
VS

Portable Pixmap

image/x-portable-pixmap
PPM

A complete technical comparison of Animated Portable Network Graphics and Portable Pixmap — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

APNG wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature APNG PPM
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Animated Portable Network Graphics
image/vnd.mozilla.apng
Extension
.apng.png
Container PNG Chunk Stream
Compression Deflate (Lossless)
Algorithm
Deflate (zlib)
Color Depth 8-bit (Indexed), 24-bit (TrueColor), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by Mozilla Corporation (Stuart Parmenter & Vladimir Vukićević)
Released 2004
Magic Bytes
89 50 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A
Full APNG reference →
Portable Pixmap
image/x-portable-pixmap
Extension
.ppm
Container Netpbm
Compression Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth 24-bit (RGB), 48-bit (RGB High Color)
Developed by Jef Poskanzer (Netpbm Project)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
50 33 (ASCII) or 50 36 (Binary)
Full PPM reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser APNG PPM
Chrome Chrome
✓ 59
 ✕
Firefox Firefox
✓ 3
 ✕
Safari Safari
✓ 8
 ✕
Edge Edge
✓ 79
 ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
APNG

APNG Strengths

  • Supports 8-bit alpha transparency, completely solving the ugly 'white halo' problem inherent to GIFs
  • Gracefully degrades; viewers that do not support APNG will render a perfectly valid, static PNG of the first frame
  • Provides lossless compression that retains absolute pixel-perfect quality for UI elements and line art
Limitations
  • Because it relies on lossless Deflate compression, file sizes for complex, video-like animations can be massive compared to lossy formats like WebP or AVIF
  • Was initially rejected by the official PNG group, delaying its adoption for nearly a decade
  • Lacks native hardware decoding acceleration, unlike video-based animated formats (like MP4 or WebM)
PPM

PPM Strengths

  • Absolute structural simplicity allows parsers and renderers (such as custom raytracers) to write directly to the format with virtually no overhead or external libraries
  • Supports 16-bit per channel (48-bit total) precision, preserving deep color accuracy before converting to final delivery formats
  • ASCII encoding ('P3') allows manual editing and visual inspection of RGB values directly within a text editor
Limitations
  • Zero compression results in astronomical file sizes, making it entirely impractical for web delivery or consumer storage
  • Does not natively support an alpha channel for transparency (this is handled by the newer PAM extension format within the Netpbm suite)
  • Lacks support for modern metadata standards like EXIF, XMP, or embedded ICC color profiles

When to choose which format

APNG
Use APNG when…
  • High-Quality Web Animations
  • Stickers (Apple iMessage, LINE, Discord)
  • UI Loaders with Alpha Transparency
  • GIF Replacement
PPM
Use PPM when…
  • Intermediary Format for Image Format Conversion
  • Academic Computer Graphics and Raytracing Output
  • Unix/Linux Command-Line Image Pipelines

More comparisons

APNG vs ACES → PPM vs ACES → APNG vs AVCI → PPM vs AVCI → APNG vs AVCS → PPM vs AVCS → APNG vs AVIF → PPM vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison