Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
APNG

Animated Portable Network Graphics

image/vnd.mozilla.apng
VS

Panasonic RAW Image

image/x-panasonic-raw
Panasonic-RAW-(RW2)

A complete technical comparison of Animated Portable Network Graphics and Panasonic RAW Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

APNG wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature APNG Panasonic-RAW-(RW2)
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
Animated Portable Network Graphics
image/vnd.mozilla.apng
Extension
.apng.png
Container PNG Chunk Stream
Compression Deflate (Lossless)
Algorithm
Deflate (zlib)
Color Depth 8-bit (Indexed), 24-bit (TrueColor), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by Mozilla Corporation (Stuart Parmenter & Vladimir Vukićević)
Released 2004
Magic Bytes
89 50 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A
Full APNG reference →
Panasonic RAW Image
image/x-panasonic-raw
Extension
.raw.rw2
Container TIFF-based (Proprietary)
Compression Uncompressed / Panasonic Proprietary Lossless
Algorithm
NoneProprietary Lossless
Color Depth 12-bit (Per Channel), 14-bit (Per Channel), 16-bit (Per Channel - High-res mode)
Developed by Panasonic Corporation
Released 2004
Magic Bytes
Older RAW: 49 49 2A 00 | Newer RW2: 49 49 55 00
Full Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser APNG Panasonic-RAW-(RW2)
Chrome Chrome
✓ 59
 ✕
Firefox Firefox
✓ 3
 ✕
Safari Safari
✓ 8
 ✕
Edge Edge
✓ 79
 ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
APNG

APNG Strengths

  • Supports 8-bit alpha transparency, completely solving the ugly 'white halo' problem inherent to GIFs
  • Gracefully degrades; viewers that do not support APNG will render a perfectly valid, static PNG of the first frame
  • Provides lossless compression that retains absolute pixel-perfect quality for UI elements and line art
Limitations
  • Because it relies on lossless Deflate compression, file sizes for complex, video-like animations can be massive compared to lossy formats like WebP or AVIF
  • Was initially rejected by the official PNG group, delaying its adoption for nearly a decade
  • Lacks native hardware decoding acceleration, unlike video-based animated formats (like MP4 or WebM)
Panasonic-RAW-(RW2)

Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) Strengths

  • Retains maximum sensor data, allowing significant recovery of highlights and shadows compared to in-camera JPEGs
  • Modern RW2 files embed proprietary lens correction profiles (distortion, vignetting, chromatic aberration) that raw converters can automatically apply
  • The unique 'IIU' signature on RW2 files makes programmatic identification extremely reliable compared to other TIFF-spoofing raw formats
Limitations
  • Proprietary format requires continuous updates to third-party processing engines whenever Panasonic releases a new Lumix camera
  • Produces very large file sizes, particularly when using Panasonic's High-Resolution multi-shot modes
  • Cannot be directly embedded into web pages or used in standard HTML/CSS contexts

When to choose which format

APNG
Use APNG when…
  • High-Quality Web Animations
  • Stickers (Apple iMessage, LINE, Discord)
  • UI Loaders with Alpha Transparency
  • GIF Replacement
Panasonic-RAW-(RW2)
Use Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Lumix Archival

More comparisons

APNG vs ACES → Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) vs ACES → APNG vs AVCI → Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) vs AVCI → APNG vs AVCS → Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) vs AVCS → APNG vs AVIF → Panasonic-RAW-(RW2) vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison