Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
APNG

Animated Portable Network Graphics

image/vnd.mozilla.apng
VS

Nikon Electronic Format

image/x-nikon-nef
Nikon-NEF

A complete technical comparison of Animated Portable Network Graphics and Nikon Electronic Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

APNG wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature APNG Nikon-NEF
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata Yes Yes
ICC Color Profile Yes Yes
Animated Portable Network Graphics
image/vnd.mozilla.apng
Extension
.apng.png
Container PNG Chunk Stream
Compression Deflate (Lossless)
Algorithm
Deflate (zlib)
Color Depth 8-bit (Indexed), 24-bit (TrueColor), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by Mozilla Corporation (Stuart Parmenter & Vladimir Vukićević)
Released 2004
Magic Bytes
89 50 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A
Full APNG reference →
Nikon Electronic Format
image/x-nikon-nef
Extension
.nef
Container TIFF
Compression Uncompressed / Lossless Compressed / Lossy Compressed (High Efficiency)
Algorithm
NoneNikon Proprietary LosslessNikon High Efficiency Lossy
Color Depth 12-bit (Per Channel), 14-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Nikon Corporation
Released 1999
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 or 4D 4D 00 2A
Full Nikon-NEF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser APNG Nikon-NEF
Chrome Chrome
✓ 59
 ✕
Firefox Firefox
✓ 3
 ✕
Safari Safari
✓ 8
 ✕
Edge Edge
✓ 79
 ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
APNG

APNG Strengths

  • Supports 8-bit alpha transparency, completely solving the ugly 'white halo' problem inherent to GIFs
  • Gracefully degrades; viewers that do not support APNG will render a perfectly valid, static PNG of the first frame
  • Provides lossless compression that retains absolute pixel-perfect quality for UI elements and line art
Limitations
  • Because it relies on lossless Deflate compression, file sizes for complex, video-like animations can be massive compared to lossy formats like WebP or AVIF
  • Was initially rejected by the official PNG group, delaying its adoption for nearly a decade
  • Lacks native hardware decoding acceleration, unlike video-based animated formats (like MP4 or WebM)
Nikon-NEF

Nikon-NEF Strengths

  • Retains maximum sensor data, allowing extreme recovery of highlights and shadows that would be permanently lost in a JPEG
  • White balance, sharpening, and color profiling are saved as metadata instructions rather than 'baked in', meaning they can be completely altered in post-production without degrading the image
  • Embeds a high-quality JPEG preview inside the raw file for rapid culling and viewing
Limitations
  • Proprietary format means it requires constant updates to raw processing engines every time Nikon releases a new camera model
  • Produces very large file sizes (often 20MB to 50MB+ per image depending on sensor resolution and bit-depth)
  • Cannot be directly embedded into web pages or used in standard HTML/CSS contexts

When to choose which format

APNG
Use APNG when…
  • High-Quality Web Animations
  • Stickers (Apple iMessage, LINE, Discord)
  • UI Loaders with Alpha Transparency
  • GIF Replacement
Nikon-NEF
Use Nikon-NEF when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Imaging Archival

More comparisons

APNG vs ACES → Nikon-NEF vs ACES → APNG vs AVCI → Nikon-NEF vs AVCI → APNG vs AVCS → Nikon-NEF vs AVCS → APNG vs AVIF → Nikon-NEF vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison