Image MIME Reference
APNG
Animated Portable Network Graphics
image/vnd.mozilla.apng
VS
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
HTJ2K-(JPH)
A complete technical comparison of Animated Portable Network Graphics and High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
APNG wins on browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | APNG | HTJ2K-(JPH) |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | Yes |
| Animation Support | Yes | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | Yes | Yes |
| HDR Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | Yes | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | Yes | Yes |
Animated Portable Network Graphics
image/vnd.mozilla.apng
Extension
.apng.png
Container
PNG Chunk Stream
Compression
Deflate (Lossless)
Algorithm
Deflate (zlib)
Color Depth
8-bit (Indexed), 24-bit (TrueColor), 32-bit (RGBA)
Developed by
Mozilla Corporation (Stuart Parmenter & Vladimir Vukićević)
Released
2004
Magic Bytes
89 50 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Image
image/jph
Extension
.jph
Container
JPH (ISO/IEC 15444-15)
Compression
Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by
Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released
2019
Magic Bytes
00 00 00 0C 6A 50 20 20 0D 0A 87 0A ... 66 74 79 70 6A 70 68 20
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | APNG | HTJ2K-(JPH) |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✓ 59
|
✕ |
Firefox
|
✓ 3
|
✕ |
Safari
|
✓ 8
|
✕ |
Edge
|
✓ 79
|
✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
APNG
APNG Strengths
- Supports 8-bit alpha transparency, completely solving the ugly 'white halo' problem inherent to GIFs
- Gracefully degrades; viewers that do not support APNG will render a perfectly valid, static PNG of the first frame
- Provides lossless compression that retains absolute pixel-perfect quality for UI elements and line art
Limitations
- Because it relies on lossless Deflate compression, file sizes for complex, video-like animations can be massive compared to lossy formats like WebP or AVIF
- Was initially rejected by the official PNG group, delaying its adoption for nearly a decade
- Lacks native hardware decoding acceleration, unlike video-based animated formats (like MP4 or WebM)
HTJ2K-(JPH)
HTJ2K-(JPH) Strengths
- Delivers orders of magnitude faster encoding and decoding than standard JPEG 2000 by utilizing a new, parallelizable block coder
- Supports mathematically lossless and lossy compression within the same codestream architecture
- Allows for resolution scalability, progressive decoding, and region-of-interest extraction without needing to decode the entire image
Limitations
- Zero native web browser support, requiring specialized libraries, API conversions, or WebAssembly (like OpenJPH.js) for web deployment
- Lack of broad consumer awareness, keeping it confined to professional, medical, and scientific workflows
- Requires more advanced software ecosystems to decode than ubiquitous formats like JPEG or WebP
When to choose which format
APNG
Use APNG when…
- High-Quality Web Animations
- Stickers (Apple iMessage, LINE, Discord)
- UI Loaders with Alpha Transparency
- GIF Replacement
HTJ2K-(JPH)
Use HTJ2K-(JPH) when…
- Medical Imaging (DICOM)
- Geospatial Data
- Digital Cinema
- Professional Archiving