Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
AOL-ART

AOL ART Image

image/x-jg
VS

Extended Image File Format

image/vnd.xiff
XIFF

A complete technical comparison of AOL ART Image and Extended Image File Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature AOL-ART XIFF
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
AOL ART Image
image/x-jg
Extension
.art
Container Johnson-Grace Proprietary
Compression Proprietary Wavelet (Photos) / Proprietary Palette-based (Graphics)
Algorithm
Wavelet (similar to early JPEG 2000 concepts)Lossy DCT
Color Depth 8-bit (Indexed), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Johnson-Grace Company (Acquired by AOL)
Released 1994
Magic Bytes
4A 47 03 00 or 4A 47 04 00
Full AOL-ART reference →
Extended Image File Format
image/vnd.xiff
Extension
.xif
Container TIFF-based Proprietary Container
Compression CCITT Group 3 / Group 4 / LZW / Uncompressed
Algorithm
CCITT Group 4LZWNone
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 8-bit (Grayscale), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Keyfile Corporation
Released 1994
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00 or 4D 4D 00 2A
Full XIFF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser AOL-ART XIFF
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
AOL-ART

AOL-ART Strengths

  • Historically provided massive file size reductions (up to 3x smaller than JPEGs of the era) and highly optimized progressive rendering for 14.4k modems
  • Enabled faster web browsing on the AOL network during the early days of the commercial internet
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary, heavily patent-encumbered, and never officially reverse-engineered for the open-source community
  • On-the-fly proxy compression ruined the visual fidelity of many 1990s websites for AOL users
  • Virtually impossible to open on modern operating systems without installing niche, legacy image viewers
XIFF

XIFF Strengths

  • Pioneered early enterprise document workflow integration by binding administrative routing data directly to the document image file
  • Leveraged efficient fax compression standards to keep storage requirements low on 1990s server infrastructure
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary and obsolete; Keyfile Corporation's software ecosystem no longer exists
  • Causes widespread MIME type identification conflicts due to sharing the exact same binary header signature as standard TIFF files
  • Zero support in modern operating systems or web browsers

When to choose which format

AOL-ART
Use AOL-ART when…
  • Historical AOL Dial-up Web Browsing
  • Legacy America Online Client Assets
  • 1990s Internet Archival
XIFF
Use XIFF when…
  • Keyfile Enterprise Document Management
  • Legacy Corporate Workflow Archival
  • Scanned Multi-page Document Routing
Share this comparison