Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
AOL-ART

AOL ART Image

image/x-jg
VS

JPEG-LS

image/jls
JPEG-LS

A complete technical comparison of AOL ART Image and JPEG-LS — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature AOL-ART JPEG-LS
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
AOL ART Image
image/x-jg
Extension
.art
Container Johnson-Grace Proprietary
Compression Proprietary Wavelet (Photos) / Proprietary Palette-based (Graphics)
Algorithm
Wavelet (similar to early JPEG 2000 concepts)Lossy DCT
Color Depth 8-bit (Indexed), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Johnson-Grace Company (Acquired by AOL)
Released 1994
Magic Bytes
4A 47 03 00 or 4A 47 04 00
Full AOL-ART reference →
JPEG-LS
image/jls
Extension
.jls.jl
Container JPEG Bitstream
Compression Lossless / Near-Lossless (Predictive Coding)
Algorithm
LOCO-I (Low Complexity Lossless Compression for Images)Golomb-Rice Coding
Color Depth 8-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (ISO/ITU-T) & HP Labs
Released 1999
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF F7
Full JPEG-LS reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser AOL-ART JPEG-LS
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
AOL-ART

AOL-ART Strengths

  • Historically provided massive file size reductions (up to 3x smaller than JPEGs of the era) and highly optimized progressive rendering for 14.4k modems
  • Enabled faster web browsing on the AOL network during the early days of the commercial internet
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary, heavily patent-encumbered, and never officially reverse-engineered for the open-source community
  • On-the-fly proxy compression ruined the visual fidelity of many 1990s websites for AOL users
  • Virtually impossible to open on modern operating systems without installing niche, legacy image viewers
JPEG-LS

JPEG-LS Strengths

  • Provides state-of-the-art lossless compression ratios for continuous-tone images, often outperforming Lossless JPEG and JPEG 2000
  • Extremely fast and computationally inexpensive to encode/decode, requiring no complex floating-point math or DCTs
  • Highly resilient in constrained hardware environments, making it ideal for medical equipment and deep-space probes (e.g., Mars rovers)
Limitations
  • Zero native support in web browsers or standard consumer operating systems
  • Lacks the advanced resolution scalability and progressive decoding features found in JPEG 2000
  • Primarily relegated to niche enterprise sectors (healthcare/DICOM and aerospace) rather than consumer adoption

When to choose which format

AOL-ART
Use AOL-ART when…
  • Historical AOL Dial-up Web Browsing
  • Legacy America Online Client Assets
  • 1990s Internet Archival
JPEG-LS
Use JPEG-LS when…
  • Medical Imaging (DICOM Encapsulation)
  • Space and Planetary Imaging (NASA/ESA)
  • Industrial Machine Vision
  • Scientific Archival Storage
Share this comparison