Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
AOL-ART

AOL ART Image

image/x-jg
VS

Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME)

image/x-dcraw
Generic-RAW

A complete technical comparison of AOL ART Image and Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature AOL-ART Generic-RAW
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
AOL ART Image
image/x-jg
Extension
.art
Container Johnson-Grace Proprietary
Compression Proprietary Wavelet (Photos) / Proprietary Palette-based (Graphics)
Algorithm
Wavelet (similar to early JPEG 2000 concepts)Lossy DCT
Color Depth 8-bit (Indexed), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Johnson-Grace Company (Acquired by AOL)
Released 1994
Magic Bytes
4A 47 03 00 or 4A 47 04 00
Full AOL-ART reference →
Digital Camera Raw (Generic Linux MIME)
image/x-dcraw
Extension
.raw
Container Varies (Predominantly TIFF/EP)
Compression Lossless / Uncompressed
Algorithm
Varies (Often Lossless JPEG ITU-T81 or uncompressed)
Color Depth 12-bit, 14-bit, 16-bit
Developed by freedesktop.org (MIME mapping) / Dave Coffin (dcraw tool)
Released 1997
Magic Bytes
Varies by vendor format
Full Generic-RAW reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser AOL-ART Generic-RAW
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
AOL-ART

AOL-ART Strengths

  • Historically provided massive file size reductions (up to 3x smaller than JPEGs of the era) and highly optimized progressive rendering for 14.4k modems
  • Enabled faster web browsing on the AOL network during the early days of the commercial internet
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary, heavily patent-encumbered, and never officially reverse-engineered for the open-source community
  • On-the-fly proxy compression ruined the visual fidelity of many 1990s websites for AOL users
  • Virtually impossible to open on modern operating systems without installing niche, legacy image viewers
Generic-RAW

Generic-RAW Strengths

  • Provides a unified, highly useful catch-all MIME type for application developers who just need to know if a file is a raw image, rather than tracking 50+ individual camera extensions
  • Deeply integrated into the Linux desktop ecosystem, ensuring file manager thumbnails work seamlessly via tools like ufraw-thumbnailer
Limitations
  • Not an official IANA standard
  • Can cause conflicts where standard TIFF files are misidentified as raw camera data by over-aggressive MIME sniffers
  • The underlying 'dcraw' tool was abandoned by its creator in 2018 (though its successor, LibRaw, continues to maintain the ecosystem)

When to choose which format

AOL-ART
Use AOL-ART when…
  • Historical AOL Dial-up Web Browsing
  • Legacy America Online Client Assets
  • 1990s Internet Archival
Generic-RAW
Use Generic-RAW when…
  • Linux Desktop File Associations (GNOME/KDE)
  • Thumbnail Generation for Raw Images (UFRaw/LibRaw)
  • Server-side Image Processing Fallbacks
Share this comparison