Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
AOL-ART

AOL ART Image

image/x-jg
VS

Group 3 Fax Image

image/g3fax
G3-Fax

A complete technical comparison of AOL ART Image and Group 3 Fax Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature AOL-ART G3-Fax
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading Yes ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
AOL ART Image
image/x-jg
Extension
.art
Container Johnson-Grace Proprietary
Compression Proprietary Wavelet (Photos) / Proprietary Palette-based (Graphics)
Algorithm
Wavelet (similar to early JPEG 2000 concepts)Lossy DCT
Color Depth 8-bit (Indexed), 24-bit (RGB)
Developed by Johnson-Grace Company (Acquired by AOL)
Released 1994
Magic Bytes
4A 47 03 00 or 4A 47 04 00
Full AOL-ART reference →
Group 3 Fax Image
image/g3fax
Extension
.g3
Container Raw Bitstream
Compression Lossless (CCITT Group 3)
Algorithm
CCITT Group 3 (Modified Huffman / READ)
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome)
Developed by CCITT (now ITU-T) / IETF
Released 1980
Magic Bytes
None (Raw Bitstream)
Full G3-Fax reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser AOL-ART G3-Fax
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
AOL-ART

AOL-ART Strengths

  • Historically provided massive file size reductions (up to 3x smaller than JPEGs of the era) and highly optimized progressive rendering for 14.4k modems
  • Enabled faster web browsing on the AOL network during the early days of the commercial internet
Limitations
  • Completely proprietary, heavily patent-encumbered, and never officially reverse-engineered for the open-source community
  • On-the-fly proxy compression ruined the visual fidelity of many 1990s websites for AOL users
  • Virtually impossible to open on modern operating systems without installing niche, legacy image viewers
G3-Fax

G3-Fax Strengths

  • Extremely efficient compression for 1-bit black-and-white text and line art
  • Standardized via RFC 1494 for email and internet fax transmission
  • Low bandwidth requirements
Limitations
  • Raw format lacks metadata (such as image width and resolution), requiring out-of-band information to decode accurately
  • Strictly limited to 1-bit monochrome imagery
  • Zero native web browser support

When to choose which format

AOL-ART
Use AOL-ART when…
  • Historical AOL Dial-up Web Browsing
  • Legacy America Online Client Assets
  • 1990s Internet Archival
G3-Fax
Use G3-Fax when…
  • Telefacsimile (Fax) Transmission
  • Internet Fax (T.37)
  • Document Archiving
  • Telephony Systems
Share this comparison