Free webp to jpg
Image MIME Reference
Alias-PIX

Alias PIX Image

image/x-alias-pix
VS

High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream

image/jphc
HTJ2K-Codestream

A complete technical comparison of Alias PIX Image and High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Alias-PIX HTJ2K-Codestream
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
Alias PIX Image
image/x-alias-pix
Extension
.pix.als.alias.img
Container Alias PIX Header
Compression Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Algorithm
RLE
Color Depth 24-bit (RGB), 8-bit (Matte/Grayscale variant)
Developed by Alias Research (Later Alias|Wavefront / Autodesk)
Released Early 1990s
Magic Bytes
No explicit magic bytes (Relies on 10-byte integer header)
Full Alias-PIX reference →
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 Codestream
image/jphc
Extension
.jhc
Container None (Raw Codestream)
Compression Lossy / Lossless
Algorithm
High-Throughput JPEG 2000 (HTJ2K)
Color Depth 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit, 38-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)
Released 2019
Magic Bytes
FF 4F FF 51
Full HTJ2K-Codestream reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Alias-PIX HTJ2K-Codestream
Chrome Chrome
Firefox Firefox
Safari Safari
Edge Edge
IE IE (Legacy)
Alias-PIX

Alias-PIX Strengths

  • The highly simplified structure made it incredibly fast to encode and decode on early 1990s SGI hardware
  • Lossless Run-Length Encoding (RLE) saved disk space without degrading the quality of final 3D renders
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete, having been replaced by more robust formats like TIFF, TGA, and EXR in modern 3D pipelines
  • The lack of a distinct magic byte signature makes reliable automated file detection almost impossible
  • Does not support integrated alpha channels, instead requiring cumbersome, separate 'Matte' files to denote transparency
HTJ2K-Codestream

HTJ2K-Codestream Strengths

  • Extremely fast encoding and decoding capabilities due to the parallelizable block coder
  • Minimal file overhead since it lacks container headers and metadata
  • Ideal for streaming applications or embedded systems where parsing a full container is unnecessary
Limitations
  • Lacks standard metadata support (like EXIF, XMP, or ICC color profiles) since there is no container structure
  • Zero native web browser compatibility
  • Difficult to distinguish from standard JPEG 2000 codestreams without deeply parsing the internal marker segments

When to choose which format

Alias-PIX
Use Alias-PIX when…
  • Legacy Alias PowerAnimator Textures
  • 1990s SGI Workstation Render Outputs
  • Historical 3D Graphics Archival
HTJ2K-Codestream
Use HTJ2K-Codestream when…
  • Medical Imaging Pipelines
  • Geospatial Data Streaming
  • Digital Cinema
  • Embedded Systems
Share this comparison